This study presents the design, development, and evaluation of a novel pneumatically actuated haptic garment, realized through a maker-driven approach. Leveraging accessible materials and open-source tools, the prototype integrates advanced computational modeling techniques, utilizing CLO 3D and ANSYS software for structural optimization and performance analysis. Experimental evaluation demonstrates the system’s capacity to deliver immersive and nuanced tactile feedback while prioritizing user comfort. The versatility of this approach is highlighted through its potential applications in diverse domains, including interactive virtual reality experiences, therapeutic wearables for sensory stimulation, and realistic training simulations. While the current iteration exhibits limitations regarding mobility due to its reliance on external pumps, this research underscores the significant potential of maker-driven methodologies and pneumatic actuation for advancing the field of wearable haptic technologies, paving the way for future innovations in portable and adaptable haptic interfaces.
HuangYYaoKLiJ, et al.
Recent advances in multi-mode haptic feedback technologies towards wearable interfaces. Mater Today Phys2022;
22: 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100602
2.
KuhailMABerengueresJTaherFAl KuwaitiM.Advances, Applications and the Future of Haptic Technology.
Cham:
Springer, 2024. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70588-5
3.
AdilkhanovARubagottiMKappassovZ.Haptic devices: wearability-based taxonomy and literature review. IEEE Access2022;
10: 91923–91947. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202986
4.
IrigoyenELarreaMGrañaM.A narrative review of haptic technologies and their value for training, rehabilitation, and the education of persons with special needs. Sensors2024;
24(21): 6946–6964. doi:10.3390/s24216946
5.
WeeCYapKMLimWN.Haptic interfaces for virtual reality: challenges and research directions. IEEE Access2021;
9: 112145–112162. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103598
6.
SorginiFCaliòRCarrozzaMCOddoCM.Haptic-assistive technologies for audition and vision sensory disabilities. Disabil Rehab Assist Technol2018;
13(4): 394–421. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1385100
7.
Fernández-CaramésTMFraga-LamasP.Towards the Internet of smart clothing: a review on IoT wearables and garments for creating intelligent connected e-textiles. Electronics2018;
7(12): 405–441. doi:10.3390/electronics7120405
8.
YinJHinchetRSheaHMajidiC.Wearable soft technologies for haptic sensing and feedback. Adv Funct Mater2021. doi:10.1002/adfm.202007428
9.
ParkJLeeYChoS, et al.
Soft sensors and actuators for wearable human–machine interfaces. Chem Rev2024;
124(4): 1464–1534. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00356
10.
SénacTLelevéAMoreauR, et al. A review of pneumatic actuators used for the design of medical simulators and medical tools. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2019. doi:10.3390/mti3030047
11.
XavierMSTawkCDZolfagharianA, et al.
Soft pneumatic actuators: a review of design, fabrication, modeling, sensing, control and applications. IEEE Access2022;
10: 59442–59485. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179589
12.
DelazioANakagakiKKlatzkyRHudsonSELehmanJFSampleA. Force Jacket: pneumatically-actuated jacket for embodied haptic experiences. In Proceedings CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173894
13.
WalkerJZidekTHarbelC, et al.
Soft robotics: a review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators. Actuators2020;
9(3): 1–26. doi:10.3390/act9010003
14.
RognonCMintchevSDell’AgnolaFCherpillodAAtienzaDFloreanoD.Flyjacket: an upper body soft exoskeleton for immersive drone control. IEEE Robot Automat Lett2018;
3(3): 2362–2369. doi:10.1109/LRA.2018.2810955
15.
KonishiYHanamitsuNOutramBMinamizawaKMizuguchiTSatoA. Synesthesia suit: the full body immersive experience. In ACM SIGGRAPH, 2016. doi:10.1145/2929490.2932629
16.
KishishitaYDasSRamirezAVThakurCTadayonRKuritaY. Muscleblazer: Force-feedback suit for immersive experience. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2019. doi:10.1109/VR.2019.8797962
17.
GüntherSSchönDMüllerFMühlhäuserMSchmitzM. PneumoVolley: pressure-based haptic feedback on the head through pneumatic actuation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020. doi:10.1145/3334480.3382916
18.
CoramMCOkamuraAMPasquierCD.Sealing the deal: effects of fabrication parameters on the performance of textile pneumatic haptic actuators. Human-Comput Interact2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.00295
19.
GariyaNKumarSShaikhAPrasadBNautiyalH.A review on soft pneumatic actuators with integrated or embedded soft sensors. Sensors Actuators A Phys2024;
372: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2024.115364
20.
HennellyPASraiJSGrahamGMeritonRKumarM.Do makerspaces represent scalable production models of community-based redistributed manufacturing?Prod Plan Control2019;
30(7): 540–557. doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1540056
21.
SinghNKSinghVKNareshB.Textile antenna for microwave wireless power transmission. Proc Comput Sci2016;
85: 856–861. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.275
22.
AkagiTDohtaSTaniT. Development of a flexible pneumatic actuator with a flexible tube. In Proceedings of the INTERMAC2001 Joint Technology Conference, 2001.
23.
PremarathnaCKulasekeraAChathurangaDLalitharatneT. A novel fabrication method for rapid prototyping of soft structures with embedded pneumatic channels. In Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), 2019. doi:10.1109/MERCon.2019.8818891
24.
Cinq-MarsMGurocakH.Pneumatic cylinder with magnetorheological brake using serpentine and helix flux guide as a linear hybrid actuator for haptics. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2017;
28(10): 1303–1321. doi:10.1177/1045389X16667562
25.
KangDLeeCGKwonO.Pneumatic and acoustic suit: multimodal haptic suit for enhanced virtual reality simulation. Virtual Reality2023;
27: 1647–1669. doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00756-5
26.
SoongRAgmataKDoyleTJenneAAdamoTSimpsonA.Combining the maker movement with accessibility needs in an undergraduate laboratory: a cost-effective text-to-speech multipurpose, Universal Chemistry Sensor Hub (MUCSH) for Students with Disabilities. J Chem Educ2018;
12: 2268–2272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00638
27.
YounSKnowlesCGMillsACMathurK.Comparative study of physical and virtual fabric parameters: physical versus virtual drape test using commercial 3D garment software. J Text Inst2025;
116: 33–46. doi:10.1080/00405000.2024.2314273
28.
GemperleFKasabachCStivoricJBauerMMartinR. Design For Wearability. In Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No. 98EX215), 1998. doi:10.1109/ISWC.1998.729537.
29.
ZeaglerC. Where to wear it: functional, technical, and social considerations in on-body location for wearable technology—20 years of designing for wearability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. New York: ACM Press, 2017; pp. 150–157. doi:10.1145/3123021.3123042.
30.
NavarajWTCarlosGNDhayalanS, et al.
Nanowire FET based neural element for robotic tactile sensing skin. Front Neurosci2017;
11: 501. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00501.
31.
WuYWangHLiA.Parameter identification methods for hyperelastic and hyper-viscoelastic models. Appl Sci2016;
6(12): 1–13. doi:10.3390/app6120386
