Comparison of reality and illusion of wetness on soft materials and the multisensory perceptual space of wetness illusion

Abstract

Skin contact with cold objects can induce the perception of wetness, known as the wetness illusion, even in the absence of actual moisture. However, the differences between wetness perceived from moisture and cooled-dry soft materials and how the material parameters affect the wetness illusion from cooled-dry soft materials remain unclear. This study recruited 12 women and 12 men to touch paired moisture and dry fabrics to compare the prescription and intensity of wetness, suggesting that the wetness illusion focused more on roughness and stickiness while the wetness of moisture fabrics sensed more on coldness. Another 12 women touched cooled-dry materials with different temperatures (10°C and 15°C), thicknesses (0.75/0.73 and 1.99/1.96 mm), and dynamic friction coefficients (mean coefficient of friction) (0.17 and 1.88), rating on wetness dissimilarity and intensity of wetness, coldness, softness, and roughness. Data were illustrated in a two-dimensional space by multidimensional scaling, in which dimension 1 represented the haptic perception in wetness, most related to the mean coefficient of friction, and dimension 2 represented the coldness perception in wetness, most related to temperature. Overall, the mean coefficient of friction and the temperature of the material had a strong influence on the wetness illusion, while the thickness had less impact. This study improves the understanding of wetness illusion and sheds light on the reproduction of wetness perception in multisensory augmented virtual reality, such as immersive gaming and virtual dress fitting.

Keywords

Wetness illusion multisensory multidimensional scaling wetness perceptual space wetness characteristics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Raccuglia

Sales

Heyde

, et al. Clothing comfort during physical exercise – determining the critical factors. Appl Ergon 2018; 73: 33–41.

Filingeri

Havenith

Peripheral and central determinants of skin wetness sensing in humans. Handbook Clin Neurol 2018; 156: 83–102.

Shibahara

Sato

Kappers

AML

. Relative Sensation of Wetness of Different Materials. In: Prattichizzo D, Shinoda H, Tan H, Ruffaldi E, Frisoli A. (eds) Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10893, pp 345–353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93445-7_30

Sugimoto

Hoshino

Watanebe

Matsumoto

, et al. “Research on display that reproduces the thermal sensation perceived by human,” IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 2019, pp. 6902–6907, doi: 10.1109/IECON.2019.8927456

Han

Wang

, et al. (eds). Mouillé: Exploring Wetness Illusion on Fingertips to Enhance Immersive Experience in VR. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20), 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376138.

Filingeri

Redortier

Hodder

, et al. Thermal and tactile interactions in the perception of local skin wetness at rest and during exercise in thermo-neutral and warm environments. Neuroscience 2014; 258: 121–130.

Peiris

Chan

Minamizawa

(2018). LiquidReality: Wetness Sensations on the Face for Virtual Reality. In: Prattichizzo D, Shinoda H, Tan H, Ruffaldi E, Frisoli A. (eds) Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10894, pp 366–378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93399-3_32.

Merrick

Rosati

Filingeri

The role of friction on skin wetness perception during dynamic interactions between the human index finger pad and materials of varying moisture content. J Neurophysiol 2022; 127: 725–736.

Tang

K-PM

Chau

K-H

Kan

C-W

, et al. Instrumental evaluation of stickiness of textiles under wet skin surface. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 24777–24792.

10.

Shibahara

Sato

(2016). Illusion of Wet Sensation by Controlling Temperature and Softness of Dry Cloth. In: Bello F, Kajimoto H, Visell Y. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9774, pp 371–379. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_34.

11.

Shibahara

Sato

Illusion of wetness by dynamic touch. IEEE Trans Haptics 2019; 99: 1.

12.

White

Hancock

PA.

Specifying advantages of multi-modal cueing: quantifying improvements with augmented tactile information. Appl Ergon 2020; 88: 103146.

13.

Scotto di Luzio

Lauretti

Cordella

, et al. Visual vs vibrotactile feedback for posture assessment during upper-limb robot-aided rehabilitation. Appl Ergon 2020; 82: 102950.

14.

Zhang

Tang

, et al. The effect of dynamic friction with wet fabrics on skin wetness perception. Int J Occup Safety Ergon 2020; 26: 370–383.

15.

Zhang

Tang

Wang

, et al. Effect of fiber type, water content, and velocity on wetness perception by the volar forearm test: threshold detection test. Perception 2020; 49: 139–154.

16.

Wildgoose

Valenza

Buoite Stella

, et al. Ageing reduces skin wetness sensitivity across the body. Exp Physiol 2021; 106: 2434–2444.

17.

Liu

, et al. Experimental study on the perception characteristics of haptic texture by multidimensional scaling. IEEE Trans Haptics 2015; 8: 410–420.

18.

Filingeri

Havenith

Human skin wetness perception: psychophysical and neurophysiological bases. Temperature 2015; 2: 86–104.

19.

Valenza

Bianco

Filingeri

Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running. J Physiol 2019; 597: 3315–3332.

20.

Zhang

Tang

Wang

, et al. Effect of fiber type, water content, and velocity on wetness perception by the volar forearm test: stimulus intensity test. Perception 2019; 48: 862–881.

21.

Raccuglia

Pistak

Heyde

, et al. Human wetness perception of fabrics under dynamic skin contact. Text Res J 2018; 88(19): 2155–2168.

22.

Mugavin

ME.

Multidimensional scaling: a brief overview. Nurs Res 2008; 57: 64–68.

23.

Skedung

Arvidsson

Chung

, et al. Feeling small: exploring the tactile perception limits. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 2617.

24.

MDS Models and Measures of Fit. In: Borg

Groenen

PJF

(eds) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York, USA: Springer New York; 2005, pp. 37–61.

25.

Shibahara

Sato

Kappers

AML.

Relative Sensation of Wetness of Different Materials. Cham: Springer, 2018.

26.

Tang

Kan

Fan

Psychophysical measurement of wet and clingy sensation of fabrics by the volar forearm test. J Sensory Stud 2015; 30: 329–347.

27.

Maggie

Chau

Kan

, et al. Magnitude estimation approach for assessing stickiness sensation perceived in wet fabrics. Fibers Polym 2018; 19: 2418–2430.