Arc explosion accidents in live working seriously threaten the safety of power workers. At present, the mainstream arc protective clothing material is aramid and blends of aramid. However, aramid will produce toxic gas under high temperature combustion, which is harmful to the health of operators. Therefore, it is a special challenge to study fabrics that are friendly to the human body and have a highly protective performance to protect electrical workers. Polyimide is nontoxic and has excellent high temperature resistance, flame retardation, and mechanical properties. In this paper, polyimide was proposed to be used as an arc protective clothing material. In order to explore the feasibility of polyimide in the field of arc protection, molecular dynamics simulation was used to compare the heat resistance of polyimide and aramid in terms of bond order and glass transition temperature. Referring to ASTM F1959 and IEC 61482-1-1, an arc test apparatus was built to test the protective properties of materials. The protection failure mechanism was analyzed by comparing the safety protective performance of polyimide and aramid fabric under the arc. It was found that polyimide has better arc thermal protective performance and break open threshold. The simulation and test results show that polyimide can be used as a material for arc protective clothing to improve protective performance.
HalászBGGöcseiGNémethB, et al. Arc protection during live-line maintenance on high voltage systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th IYCE. Pisa, Italy, 27–30 May 2015, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
2.
HalászBGNémethBGöcseiG. A special risk during live-line maintenance. In: Proceedings of the CDEE. Pilsen, Czech Republic, 6–8 September 2016, pp. 1–4. IEEE.
3.
GolovkovMSchauHBurdgeG.Electric arc: protecting against thermal effect. Part 1: Types of electric arc. Prof Safety2017;
62: 49–54.
4.
GolovkovMSchauHBurdgeG.Electric arc: protecting against thermal effect. Part 2: Fundamentals of protection. Prof Safety2017;
62: 39–45.
5.
MohlaDLeeWJPhillipsJ, et al.
Introduction to IEEE Standard 1584: Guide for performing arc-flash hazard calculations. IEEE Ind Appl2020;
26: 64–76.
6.
StokesADSweetingDK.Electric arcing burn hazards. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2006;
42: 134–141.
7.
NFPA 70E: 2012. Standard for electrical safety in the workplace. USA: National Fire Protection Association.
FloydHLDoanDRWuCT, et al. Arc flash hazards and electrical safety program implementation. In: 40th IAS Annual Meeting. Conf Rec Ind Appl Conf. Hong Kong, China, 2–6 October 2005, pp. 1919–1923. IEEE.
10.
CamponogaraMMarchesanAPGBernardonDP, et al. Impact of electrodes configuration on incident energy analysis using IEEE Std 1584. In: IEEE PES Conference T&D LA. Montevideo, Uruguay, 28 September to 2 October 2020, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
11.
LuzDPMillanLSAlessiMS, et al.
Electrical burns: a retrospective analysis across a 5-year period. Burns2009;
35: 1015–1019.
12.
GammonTLeeWJIntwariI.Reframing our view of workplace “electrical” injuries. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2019;
55: 4370–4376.
13.
StollAMChiantaMA.Heat transfer through fabrics as related to thermal injury. Trans NY Acad Sci1971;
33: 649–670.
14.
SweetingD.Testing PPE for arc-hazard protection IEC 61482-1 test-rig evaluation including proposed changes. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2011;
47: 695–706.
15.
HoaglandEH.Arc flash PPE research update. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2013;
49: 1177–1187.
16.
BottaroMde CarvalhoTOCairesLE, et al.
Analysis of asymmetrical component influence on arc current in the determination of arc thermal performance value of protective personal equipment. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2018;
55: 2130–2137.
17.
HoaglandEGolovkovMMauriceC, et al.
Clothing in arc flash: four types of arc exposure and the effect of moisture on garment appearance after an arc event. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2014;
50: 2370–2374.
18.
DoanDR.When to replace personal protective equipment [electrical safety]. IEEE Ind Appl2021;
27: 7–77.
19.
ASTM F1959/F1959M: 2014. Standard test method for determining the arc rating of materials for clothing. USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
20.
IEC 61482-1-1: 2009. Live working-protective clothing against the thermal hazards of an electric arc. Part 1-1: Test methods – Method 1: Determination of the arc rating (ATPV or EBT50) of flame resistant materials for clothing. Switzerland: International Electro technical Commission.
21.
HoaglandH.Flame resistant textiles for electric arc flash hazards. Handbk Fire Resist Text2013;
20: 549–580.
22.
LiXSunQWangS, et al.
Influence of incident energy on the properties of arc rated para-aramid fabric. Text Res J2021;
91: 2500–2507.
23.
ZhuWTangHSunQ, et al.
Mathematical model used for predicting arc-flash protective performance of fabrics based on physical parameters. Text Res J2021;
91: 2962–2968.
24.
HoaglandHMorrowB.Using rainwear as switching jackets: a reasonable solution for electric arc exposure. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2000;
36: 1241–1246.
25.
HoaglandEGolovkovMPailingR, et al.
Study of effects of mining industry contaminations on protective properties of arc rated clothing using ASTM F1959. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2014;
51: 159–162.
26.
KlausingSLHoaglandH.Arc-rated clothing: Evaluation of the effects of sweat and layering on performance. Profess Safety2019;
64: 31–36.
27.
Sezer HicyilmazAAltinYBedelogluA.Polyimide‐coated fabrics with multifunctional properties: flame retardant, UV protective, and water proof. J Appl Polym Sci2019;
136: 47616–47625.
28.
LiCStrachanA.Molecular scale simulations on thermoset polymers: a review. J Polym Sci Pt B-Polym Phys2015;
53: 103–122.
29.
ChenWWangWLiangH, et al.
Molecular dynamics simulations of lubricant outflow in porous polyimide retainers of bearings. Langmuir2021;
37: 9162–9169.
30.
LiuYXieFHuangJ, et al.
The effect of molecular isomerism on the barrier properties of polyimides: perspectives from experiments and simulations. Polymers2021;
13: 1749–1762.
31.
ChangKSTungKLLinYF, et al.
Molecular modelling of polyimides with intrinsic microporosity: from structural characteristics to transport behaviour. RSC Adv2013;
3: 10403–10413.
32.
YanYXuJZhuH, et al.
Molecular dynamics simulation of the interface properties of continuous carbon fiber/polyimide composites. Appl Surf Sci2021;
563: 150370–150380.
33.
SunSChenSWengX, et al.
Effect of carbon nanotube addition on the interfacial adhesion between graphene and epoxy: a molecular dynamics simulation. Polymers2019;
11: 121–133.
34.
LiMZhouHZhangY, et al.
The effect of defects on the interfacial mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. RSC Adv2017;
7: 46101–46108.
35.
LiuC.Polyimide film. N Chem Mater1983;
3: 18–20.
36.
YanCLiuJPanH.The performance of “SUPLON” and its application in security protection. Synth Fiber China2017;
46: 36–39.
37.
ZhangJLiangYYanJ, et al.
Study of the molecular weight dependence of glass transition temperature for amorphous poly (L-lactide) by molecular dynamics simulation. Polymer2007;
48: 4900–4905.
38.
PanRLiuXZhangA, et al.
Molecular simulation on structure–property relationship of polyimides with methylene spacing groups in biphenyl side chain. Comp Mater Sci2007;
39: 887–895.
39.
TanakaKKitaHOkanoM, et al.
Permeability and permselectivity of gases in fluorinated and non-fluorinated polyimides. Polymer1992;
33: 585–592.
