Chitosan material has multiple functions that attract attention from the textile industry, while textile structures make the biocompatible, osteo-conductive and resorbable material promising in a wide range of applications. When the material becomes fibers, the resulting length, strength, fineness and softness would grant the material functions such as structure capacity and a layering system. However, the expected win-win situation is not seen in reality. Special properties of the chitosan material may burden its way of application. In addition, market recognition of chitosan, differences between chitosan, chitin and seaweed fibers, differences in antibacterial post-treatment, testing standards of chitosan, antimicrobial and antibacterial treatment in downstream production and fuzzy concepts of users are also concerns and challenges related to chitosan. Gaps and misunderstandings between the supplier, manufacturer, consumer and researchers are clarified. Testing standards are compared by their purpose, mechanism and scope, while in this article, more attention is given to the application side. Existing forms of semi or final textile chitosan products, fabrication process and evaluation methods are reviewed and discussed for their feasibility towards application. In the end, a product development process flow is given marking concerns in each step of production to guide production and sourcing.
MassellaDGiraudSGuanJ, et al.
Textiles for health: a review of textile fabrics treated with chitosan microcapsules. Environment Chem Lett2019;
17: 1787–1800.
2.
CostaEMSilvaSVeigaM, et al.
Textile dyes loaded chitosan nanoparticles: characterization, biocompatibility and staining capacity. Carbohydr Polym2021;
251: 117120.
3.
ButolaBS.Recent advances in chitosan polysaccharide and its derivatives in antimicrobial modification of textile materials. Int J Biol Macromol2019;
121: 905–912.
4.
QamarSAAshiqMJahangeerM, et al.
Chitosan-based hybrid materials as adsorbents for textile dyes – a review. Case Studies Chem Environ Enging2020;
2: 100021.
5.
AllanCRHadwigerLA.The fungicidal effect of chitosan on fungi of varying cell wall composition. Exp Mycol1979;
3: 285–287.
6.
ShanmugasundaramOMahendra GowdaR.Development and characterization of cotton, organic cotton flat knit fabrics coated with chitosan, sodium alginate, calcium alginate polymers, and antibiotic drugs for wound healing. J Ind Text2012;
42: 156–175.
7.
ZhangZChenLJiJ, et al.
Antibacterial properties of cotton fabrics treated with chitosan. Text Res J2003;
73: 1103–1106.
8.
DevVGVenugopalJSudhaS, et al.
Dyeing and antimicrobial characteristics of chitosan treated wool fabrics with henna dye. Carbohydr Polym2009;
75: 646–650.
9.
HsiehSHHuangZHuangZ, et al.
Antimicrobial and physical properties of woolen fabrics cured with citric acid and chitosan. J Appl Polym Sci2004;
94: 1999–2007.
10.
Abou-OkeilAShetaAAmrA, et al.
Wound dressing based on nonwoven viscose fabrics. Carbohydr Polym2012;
90: 658–666.
11.
SudarshanNHooverDKnorrD.Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol1992;
6: 257–272.
12.
ChoiB-KKimK-YYooY-J, et al.
In vitro antimicrobial activity of a chitooligosaccharide mixture against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Streptococcus mutans. Int J Antimicrob Agents2001;
18: 553–557.
13.
EatonPFernandesJCPereiraE, et al.
Atomic force microscopy study of the antibacterial effects of chitosans on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Ultramicroscopy2008;
108: 1128–1134.
14.
Leuba S and Stossel P. Chitosan and other polyamines: Antifungal activity and interaction with biological membranes. In: Muzzarelli R, Jeuniaux C and Gooday GW (eds). Chitin in nature and technology. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1985, pp. 215.
15.
QinCLiHXiaoQ, et al.
Water-solubility of chitosan and its antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr Polym2006;
63: 367–374.
16.
LuoXLiL.Evaluation of single-component chitosan fiber: from advanced materials to contemporary fashion manufacturing. Text Res J2020;
90: 125–134.
17.
FernandesJCTavariaFKFonsecaSC, et al.
In vitro screening for anti-microbial activity of chitosans and chitooligosaccharides, aiming at potential uses in functional textiles. J Microbiol Biotechnol2010;
20: 311–318.
18.
NoHKParkNYLeeSH, et al.
Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights. Int J Food Microbiol2002;
74: 65–72.
19.
LiuNChenX-GParkH-J, et al.
Effect of MW and concentration of chitosan on antibacterial activity of Escherichia coli. Carbohydr Polym2006;
64: 60–65.
20.
PercivalSLMcCartySHuntJA, et al.
The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen2014;
22: 174–186.
21.
ChungY-CWangH-LChenY-M, et al.
Effect of abiotic factors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan against waterborne pathogens. Bioresource Technol2003;
88: 179–184.
22.
KongMChenXGXingK, et al.
Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int J Food Microbiol2010;
144: 51–63.
23.
TokuraSUenoKMiyazakiS, et al.
Molecular weight dependent antimicrobial activity by chitosan. N Macromol Architect Functions1996; 120: 199–207.
24.
TikhonovVEStepnovaEABabakVG, et al.
Bactericidal and antifungal activities of a low molecular weight chitosan and its N-/2 (3)-(dodec-2-enyl) succinoyl/-derivatives. Carbohydr Polym2006;
64: 66–72.
ZhengL-YZhuJ-F.Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydr Polym2003;
54: 527–530.
27.
BenltoufaSMiledWTradM, et al.
Chitosan hydrogel‐coated cellulosic fabric for medical end-use: antibacterial properties, basic mechanical and comfort properties. Carbohydr Polym2020;
227: 115352.
28.
ZhangZZhaoZZhengZ, et al.
Functionalization of polyethylene terephthalate fabrics using nitrogen plasma and silk fibroin/chitosan microspheres. Appl Surface Sci2019;
495: 143481.
29.
TaheriPKhajeh-AmiriA.Antibacterial cotton fabrics via immobilizing silver phosphate nanoparticles onto the chitosan nanofiber coating. Int J Biol Macromol2020;
158: 282–289.
30.
AibaS-i.Studies on chitosan: 1. Determination of the degree of N-acetylation of chitosan by ultraviolet spectrophotometry and gel permeation chromatography. Int J Biol Macromol1986;
8: 173–176.
31.
YomotaCMiyazakiTOkadaS.Determination of the viscometric constants for chitosan and the application of universal calibration procedure in its gel permeation chromatography. Colloid Polym Sci1993;
271: 76–82.
32.
KiangTWenJLimHW, et al.
The effect of the degree of chitosan deacetylation on the efficiency of gene transfection. Biomaterials2004;
25: 5293–5301.
33.
MellegårdHStrandSChristensenB, et al.
Antibacterial activity of chemically defined chitosans: influence of molecular weight, degree of acetylation and test organism. Int J Food Microbiol2011;
148: 48–54.
34.
TakahashiTImaiMSuzukiI, et al.
Growth inhibitory effect on bacteria of chitosan membranes regulated with deacetylation degree. Biochem Engng J2008;
40: 485–491.
35.
LiuSHuaTLuoX, et al.
A novel approach to improving the quality of chitosan blended yarns using static theory. Text Res J2015;
85: 1022–1034.
36.
EnescuD.Use of chitosan in surface modification of textile materials. Rouman Biotechnol Lett2008;
13: 4037–4048.
37.
LimS-HHudsonSM.Review of chitosan and its derivatives as antimicrobial agents and their uses as textile chemicals. J Macromol Sci, part C: Polym Rev2003;
43: 223–269.
38.
LimS-HHudsonSM.Application of a fiber-reactive chitosan derivative to cotton fabric as an antimicrobial textile finish. Carbohydr Polym2004;
56: 227–234.
39.
ShanmugasundaramO.Chitosan coated cotton yarn and it’s effect on antimicrobial activity. J Text Apparel Technol Manage2006;
5: 1–6.
