An empirical survey was conducted, manually evaluating the relative haptic preference of patterns in weft knitting for winter garments in Mönchengladbach, Germany. Thirty-six patterns were compared in a blind test using ranking orders with respect to six primary hand values (thickness, softness, warmth, weight, stiffness, and smoothness) and general preference for winter garments by 35 participants. Traits of popular patterns included softness and smoothness as well as tucked stitches, rib structures, and float stitches on the surface. On the other hand, unpopular patterns included lace, purl stitches, and ripples.
BishopDP. Fabrics: sensory and mechanical properties. Text Prog1996; 26: 1–62.
2.
Goldstein EB, Irtel H and Plata G (eds). Wahrnehmungspsychologie: Der Grundkurs. 7. Aufl., Nachdr. Berlin: Spektrum Akad., 2011.
3.
Ciesielska-WrobelILvan LangenhoveL. The hand of textiles - definitions, achievements, perspectives - a review. Text Res J2012; 82: 1457–1468.
4.
Behery HM (ed.). Effect of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand. Boca Raton, FL, Cambridge: CRC, 2005.
5.
EllisBCGarnsworthyRK. A review of techniques for the assessment of hand. Text Res J1980; 50: 231–238.
6.
Hasani H. Analyse der physikalischen Grundlagen zur Entwicklung eines integralen Messverfahrens für die Bestimmung des Warengriffs an Maschenwaren. Universität Stuttgart, 2007.
7.
MaharTJWangHPostleR. A review of fabric tactile properties and their subjective assessment for next-to-skin knitted fabrics. J Text Inst2013; 104: 572–589.
8.
MaharTJWheelwrightPDhingraRCet al.Measuring and interpreting low-stress mechanical and surface properties: Part V: fabric handle attributes and quality descriptors. Text Res J1990; 60: 7–17.
9.
AlimaaDMatsuoTNakajimaMet al.Sensory measurements of the main mechanical parameters of knitted fabrics. Text Res J2000; 70: 985–990.
10.
HallosRSBurnipMSWeirA. The handle of double-jersey knitted fabrics Part I: polar profiles. J Text Inst1990; 81: 15–35.
11.
El-Ghezal JeguirimSAdolpheDCSahnounMet al.Intelligent techniques for modeling the relationships between sensory attributes and instrumental measurements of knitted fabrics. J Eng Fibres Fabrics2012; 7: 88–97.
12.
JuJRyuH. A study on subjective assessment of knit fabric by ANFIS. Fibers Polym2006; 7: 203–212.
13.
ParkSHwangYKangBet al.Total handle evaluation from selected mechanical properties of knitted fabrics using neural network. Int J Clothing Sci Technol2001; 13: 106–114.
14.
ChenYCollierBHuPet al.Objective evaluation of fabric softness. Text Res J2000; 70: 443–448.
15.
BacciLCamilliFDragoSet al.Sensory evaluation and instrumental measurements to determine tactile properties of wool fabrics. Text Res J2012; 82: 1430–1441.
16.
StrazdienėEBen SaïdSGutauskasMet al.The evaluation of fabric treatment by Griff tester and sensory analysis. Int J Clothing Sci Technol2006; 18: 326–334.
17.
MaharTJPostleR. Measuring and interpreting low-stress fabric mechanical and surface properties: Part IV: subjective evaluation of fabric handle. Text Res J1989; 59: 721–733.
18.
ChoiM-SAshdownSP. Effect of changes in knit structure and density on the mechanical and hand properties of weft-knitted fabrics for outerwear. Text Res J2000; 70: 1033–1045.
19.
Mäkinen M and Meinander H (eds). Influence of physical parameters on fabric hand. In: Proceedings of the HAPTEX'05 Workshop on Haptic and Tactile Perception of Deformable Objects, University of Hanover, Hanover, 2005.
20.
HasaniH. Effect of different processing stages on mechanical and surface properties of cotton knitted fabrics. Ind J Fibre Text Res2010; 35: 139–144.
21.
BeheryHM. Comparison of fabric hand assessment in the United States and Japan. Text Res J1986; 56: 227–240.
22.
CardelloAVWinterhalterCSchutzHG. Predicting the handle and comfort of military clothing fabrics from sensory and instrumental data: development and application of new psychophysical methods. Text Res J2003; 73: 221–237.
23.
El-Ghezal JeguirimSDhouibABSahnounMet al.Sensory and instrumental techniques evaluating the effect of structure parameters on the tactile properties of knitted fabrics. J Texture Stud2010; 41: 714–735.
24.
SülarVOkurA. Objective evaluation of fabric handle by simple measurement methods. Text Res J2008; 78: 856–868.
25.
PhilippeFSchacherLAdolpheDCet al.The sensory panel applied to textile goods – a new marketing tool. J Fashion Marketing Manag2003; 7: 235–248.
26.
KweonS-ALeeE-KChoiJ-M. A comparative study on the subjective fabric hand according to gender for winter sleepwear fabrics. Fibers Polym2004; 5: 6–11.
27.
El-Ghezal JeguirimSDhouibABSahnounMet al.The tactile sensory evaluation of knitted fabrics: effect of some finishing treatments. J Sens Stud2010; 25: 201–215.
28.
Pensé-LhéritierAMGuilabertCBuenoMAet al.Sensory evaluation of the touch of a great number of fabrics. Food Qual Pref2006; 17: 482–488.
29.
PhilippeFSchacherLAdolpheDCet al.Tactile feeling: sensory analysis applied to textile goods. Text Res J2004; 74: 1066–1072.
30.
RaheelMJiang Liu. An empirical model for fabric hand: part ii: subjective assessment. Text Res J1991; 61: 79–82.
31.
WinakorGKimCJWolinsL. Fabric hand: tactile sensory assessment. Text Res J1980; 50: 601–610.
32.
BrooksKA. Subjective assessment of wet-raised woollen fabric. J Text Inst1991; 82: 285–290.
ParkS-WHwangY-G. Measuring and fuzzy predicting total handle from selected mechanical properties of double weft-knitted fabrics. Text Res J1999; 69: 19–24.
35.
FuzekJF. Some factors affecting the comfort assessment of knit T-shirts. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev1981; 20: 254–259.
36.
ChenP-LBarkerRLSmithGWet al.Handle of weft knit fabrics. Text Res J1992; 62: 200–211.
37.
AuKFChanCNHoYM. An assessment of softness property of knitted golf fabrics. Text Apparel2002; 6: 37–49.
38.
LiYKeighleyJHMclntyreJEet al.Predictability between objective physical factors of fabrics and subjective preference votes for derived garments. J Text Inst1991; 82: 277–284.
39.
Lun YickKChengKLai HowY. Subjective and objective evaluation of men’s shirting fabrics. Int J Clothing Sci Technol1995; 7: 17–29.
40.
WongALiYYeungPet al.Neural network predictions of human psychological perceptions of clothing sensory comfort. Text Res J2003; 73: 31–37.
41.
El-Ghezal JeguirimSDhouibABSahnounMet al.The use of fuzzy logic and neural networks models for sensory properties prediction from process and structure parameters of knitted fabrics. J Intell Manuf2011; 22: 873–884.
42.
El-Ghezal JeguirimSSahnounMBabay DhouibAet al.Predicting compression and surfaces properties of knits using fuzzy logic and neural networks techniques. Int J Clothing Sci Technol2011; 23: 294–309.
43.
ZengXKoehlL. Representation of the subjective evaluation of the fabric hand using fuzzy techniques. Int J Intell Syst2003; 18: 355–366.
44.
HuiCLLauTWNgSFet al.Neural network prediction of human psychological perceptions of fabric hand. Text Res J2004; 74: 375–383.
45.
ParkS-WHwangY-GKangB-Cet al.Applying fuzzy logic and neural networks to total hand evaluation of knitted fabrics. Text Res J2000; 70: 675–681.
46.
WongALiYYeungP. Predicting clothing sensory comfort with artificial intelligence hybrid models. Text Res J2004; 74: 13–19.
47.
Ciesielska-WrobelILvan LangenhoveLGrabowskaK. Fingertip skin models for analysis of the haptic perception of textiles. JBiSE2014; 07: 1–6.
48.
Peinecke N, Wolter F-E and Allerkamp D. Generating tactile textures using periodicity analysis. In: 2013 International Conference on Cyberworlds, 2007, pp. 308–313. DOI: 10.1109/CW.2007.50.
49.
JacobsenMFritzADhingraRet al.A psychophysical evaluation of the tactile qualities of hand knitting yarns. Text Res J1992; 62: 557–566.
50.
MackayCAnandSCBishopDP. Effects of laundering on the sensory and mechanical properties of 1 x 1 rib knitwear fabrics: Part II: changes in sensory and mechanical properties. Text Res J1999; 69: 252–260.
51.
BrownP. The effects of tumble-drying on some sensory and physical properties of acrylic knitwear. Text Res J1970; 40: 536–542.
52.
NaebeMLutzVMcGregorBAet al.Effect of surface treatment and knit structure on comfort properties of wool fabrics. J Text Inst2013; 104: 600–605.
53.
ParkS-WHwangY-G. Comparison of total hand of single knitted fabrics made from lincLITE(R) and conventional wool yarns. Text Res J2002; 72: 924–930.
54.
KaneCDPatilUJSudhakarP. Studies on the influence of knit structure and stitch length on ring and compact yarn single jersey fabric properties. Text Res J2007; 77: 572–582.
55.
EmirhanovaNKavusturanY. Effects of knit structure on the dimensional and physical properties of winter outerwear knitted fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur2008; 16: 69–74.
56.
Hoffman RM and Beste LF (eds). Some relations of fibre properties to fabric hand. Text Rex J 1951; 21: 66–77.
57.
McGregorBANaebeM. Effect of fibre, yarn and knitted fabric attributes associated with wool comfort properties. J Text Inst2013; 104: 606–617.
58.
ReumannR-D. Prüfverfahren in der Textil- und Bekleidungstechnik, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2000.
