Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Fabric-evoked prickle sensation is one of the most important criteria used by consumers in judging clothing comfort. In this study, a measurement method that is capable of characterizing and ranking the subjective prickle score sensation of various wear fabric products has been developed using seven different materials. A 1–7 subjective rating scale was adopted for response measurement and eight different fabrics varying in fiber composition were evaluated by 31 subjects. In addition, the sensitivity of six separate areas of the human skin were tested, namely the right forearm, back neck, the upper back, abdomen, right side waist and right inner thigh. The testing technique was standardized, to incorporate within-subject reliability and between-subject uniformity. The result is rational with a barely slight prickle sensation for the cotton, cashmere and cotton/polyester fabrics and high prickle score feeling for the ramie, wool and jute fabrics. The influence of different human body part areas was investigated when subjects rated the wear fabric based on prickle sensation. The result showed no significant difference between body parts (P < 0.05).

Keywords

wear fabric tactile comfort prickle human skin body part areas body sensation rating scale

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

. The science of clothing comfort. Text Prog 2001; 31: 1–135.

Wong

. Clothing biosensory engineering 2006; Vol. 1. USA: Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press, pp. 1–123.

Gwosdow

Stevens

Berglund

. Skin friction and fabric sensations in neutral and warm environments. Text Res J 1986; 56: 574–580.

NNaylor

Stanton

Speijers

. Skin comfort of base layer wool garments. Part 2: fiber diameter effects on fabric and garment prickle. Text Res J 2014; 84: 1506–1514.

Nawaz

Troynikov

Watson

. Evaluation of surface characteristics of fabrics suitable for skin layer of firefighters’ protective clothing. Phys Proc 2011; 22: 478–486.

Garnsworthy

Gully

Kenins

. Identification of the physical stimulus and the neural basis of fabric-evoked prickle. J Neurophysiol 1988; 59: 1083–1097.

Garnsworthy

Gully

Kandiah

. Understanding the causes of prickle and itch from the skin contact of fabrics. CSIRO Division of Wool Technology Report No 64, 1988. Also published in Aust Text 1988; 8: 26–29.

Garnsworthy

Gully

Kenins

. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and the sensation of prickle. J Neurophysiol 1988; 59: 1116–1127.

Naylor

GRS

Veitch

Mayfield

. Fabric-evoked prickle. Text Res J 1992; 62: 487–493.

10.

Naylor

GRS

. The role of coarse fibres in fabric prickle using blended acrylic fibres of different diameters. Wool Technol Sheep Breed 1992; 40: 14–18.

11.

Hatch

Markee

Howard

. Skin response to fabric. Skin response to fabric: a review of studies and assessment methods. Cloth Text Res J 1992; 10: 54–63.

12.

Elsner

Hatch

Wigger-Alberti

. Textiles and the skin, Basel, Switzerland: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, 2003.

13.

Yang

Ding

. Probability of prickliness detection in a model of populations of fiber ends prickling human skin. Fibers Polym 2012; 13: 79–86.

14.

Ding

. Neuromechanical representation of fabric-evoked prickliness: a fiber-skin-neuron model. Cogn Neurodyn 2010; 5: 161–170.

15.

Dale

PGJ

David

William

. Neuroscience, New York: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2006, pp. 209–229.

16.

Lawless HT and Heymann H. Measurement of sensory thresholds. Sensory evaluation of food. New York: Springer, 2010, pp.125–147.

17.

Gallace

Spence

. The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 246–259.

18.

Suelar

Okur

. Sensory evaluation methods for tactile properties of fabrics. J Sens Stud 2007; 22: 1–16.

19.

Inoue

Nakayama

Niwa

. Relationship between the warm/cool feeling of fabric and the subjective evaluation of the quality of ladies knitted fabrics. Int J Cloth Sci Tech 2010; 22: 7–15.

20.

Stanton

Speijers

Naylor

GRS

. Skin comfort of base layer knitted garments. Part 1: description and evaluation of wearer test protocol. Text Res J 2014; 84: 1385–1399.

21.

Doyle

Tester

Thompson

. A simple sleeve test worn during exercise to quantify skin feel and willingness to pay for wool fabric samples. Text Res J 2015; 85(11): 1131–1139.

22.

Asad

RAM

Weidong

Zheng

. Characterization of prickle tactile discomfort properties of different textile single fibers using an axial fiber-compression-bending analyzer (FICBA). Text Res J 2015; 85: 512–523.

23.

AATCC Procedure 5-2006, Fabric Hand. Guidelines for the subjective evaluation of fabrics. AATCC Technical Manual, 2008, pp.382–383.

24.

McGlone

Reilly

. The cutaneous sensory system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 148–159.

25.

Goldstein

. Sensation and perception 20108th ed. Belmont, USA: Cengage Brain, pp. 22–145.

26.

Lawless HT and Heymann H. Scaling. Sensory evaluation of food. New York: Springer, 2010, pp.149–177.

27.

Plante

Holcombe

. The physical mechanisms of the perception of dampness in fabrics. J Therm Biol 1993; 18: 417–419.

28.

Ding

Yang

. Physiological principle of tactile discriminability of fabric softness by touching method. J Fiber Bioeng Inform 2008; 1: 99–106.

Subjective evaluations of fabric-evoked prickle using the unidimensional rating scale from different body areas

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References