Mechanical and physicochemical contribution in removal of different soil types on cotton fabric

Abstract

The research was conducted to identify the optimal washing methods for three types of soils, in terms of washing efficiency and eco-efficiency. To this end, the mechanical action by the washer’s agitation and the physicochemical action by detergents were investigated for their respective contribution to the detergency of three kinds of artificial soils: oil, protein, and their mixture. In general, washing efficiency increased with the increased agitation speed and the amount of detergent use. Most of the washing conditions presented a positive synergistic effect when both the mechanical and physicochemical actions were applied simultaneously.

The contributing ratio of the physicochemical action was greater for oily soil than for other soil types, due to the effective rolling-up by the detergent for the oily soil. The contributing ratio attributable to the mechanical action was higher when the protein was present in the soil composition, and the mechanical contribution was compromised as detergent usage was increased. The washing condition with the largest synergy did not always correspond with the condition of the highest washing efficiency. Energy Efficiency for Detergency was increased in all soil types as the agitation speed increased. It is suggested that the washing method be determined considering (1) the level of soiling and the acceptable washing performance, (2) the synergistic effect of mechanical and physicochemical actions, and (3) the eco-efficiency of washing methods.

Keywords

washing efficiency contributing ratio mechanical physicochemical soil

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kim

. Science of detergent and washing, 2nd ed. Paju: Kyomunsa, Paju, 2008.

Yun

Park

. The effect of fabric movement on washing performance in a front loading washer. Text Res J 2013; 83: 1786–1795.

Park

Yun

Park

. The effects of fabric properties on fabric movement and the prediction of the fabric movements in a front-loading washer. Text Res J 2013; 83: 1201–1212.

Fort

Billica

Sloan

. Studies of soiling and detergency: Part I: Observations of naturally soiled textile fibers. Text Res J 1966; 36: 7–12.

Fort

Billica

Grindstaff

. Studies of soiling and detergency: Part II: detergency Experiments with model fatty soils. Text Res J 1966; 36: 99–112.

Grinstaff

Patterson

Billica

. Studies of soiling and detergency: Part III: Detergency experiments with particulate carbon soils. Text Res J 1967; 37: 564–573.

Grinstaff

Patterson

Billica

. Studies of soiling and detergency: Part IV: Deposition and transfer experiments with fatty soils. Text Res J 1970; 40: 35–42.

Ganguli

Endenburg

. Mass transfer in a laboratory washing machine. Text Res J 1980; 50: 428–432.

Gotoh

. Investigation of optimum liquid for textile washing using artificially soiled fabrics. Text Res J 2010; 80: 548–556.

10.

Zoller U. Hand book of detergents, part E: Applications. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

11.

Raney KH, Benton WJ, Miller CA, et al. (eds) Macro- and microemulsions: theory and applications. ACS Symposium Series. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1985.

12.

Woo

Kim

Park

. Contributing ratio of the mechanical and the physicochemical actions to washing efficiency of mineral oil and protein soils. Fiber Polym 2013; 15: 645–652.

13.

Carrol

. Physical aspects of detergency. Colloids Surf A 1993; 74: 131–167.

14.

Shim

Park

. Surface properties and detergency of the binary surfactant mixture. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 1997; 21: 632–640.

15.

Kim

Park

. Detergency and soil redeposition in a dry cleaning system – the effect of surfactant type and their mixture. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 1999; 23: 1030–1039.

16.

Lee

Park

. Removal mechanisms of oily soils (I) - rolling up of triolein and oleic acid. J Korean Fiber Soc 1997; 34: 40–48.

17.

Gotoh

. Evaluation of detergency using artificially soiled multifiber fabrics. J Oleo Sci 2010; 59: 477–482.

18.

Suh

Park

. Effect of mixing protease and lipase on detergency. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 2000; 24: 205–213.

19.

Srivasta

Kini

Rout

. Detergency in spontaneously formed emulsions. J Colloid Interf Sci 2006; 304: 214–221.

20.

Tagawa

Gotoh

. Removal of carbon black particles from polymer substrates in water/ethanol mixtures. J Oleo Sci 2010; 59: 109–112.

21.

Malmos

. Enzymes for detergents. Chem Ind 1990; 6: 183–186.

22.

Aysan

Merih

Bengi

. The effects of washing conditions in soil removal in domestic laundering processes. Autex Res J 2004; 4: 101–112.

23.

Kissa

. Kinetics of oily soil release. Text Res J 1971; 41: 760–767.

24.

Lee

Seo

Yang

. The effects of mechanical actions on washing efficiency. Fibers Polym 2008; 9: 101–106.

25.

John

Short

. Power consumption of a Terg-O-Tometer. Text Res J 1960; 30: 989–993.

26.

Jay CH. Detergency evaluation. III. Adjustment of Terg-O-Tometer and launderometer wash test methods to produce comparable soil removal data. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1952; 110–113.

27.

Park

Kim

Jung

. A study on the artificially soiled fabric containing oil soluble dye as an indicator. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 1997; 21: 58–66.

28.

Brown

Thomson

Stewart

. Oil take up and removal by washing from polyester, polyester/cotton blend and other fabrics. Text Res J 1968; 38: 735–743.

29.

Smulders

. Laundry detergents, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH GmbH, 2002.

30.

Lee

Shim

. Influences of protease on the removal of protein soils from cotton fabrics –emphasis on the characteristics of enzyme and soil substrates. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 1993; 17: 491–505.