Cotton fibers are trichome cells composed primarily of cellulose. Mature fibers have more cellulose and a greater degree of cell wall thickening, and perform better than less mature fibers during textile processing. An automated polarized light microscope instrument called Siro-Mat that measures cotton fiber cell wall thickening was employed to assess the maturity of developing fibers from single cotton fruit. Fruit were taken from the first fruiting branch and position on glasshouse grown Gossypium hirsutum L. (Upland) and G. barbadense L. (Pima) plants, sequentially harvested from 24 days postanthesis (dpa) at approximately four-day intervals up until approximately 50 dpa. The instrument assessed an average of 13,000 fiber snippets per fruit. Upland fibers matured at a slower rate than Pima fibers up to 35 dpa. However, after 45 dpa Upland fibers had achieved a higher average maturity (i.e. 0.99 birefringence maturity index (BMI), cf. 0.79 for Pima). For both species the uniformity of fiber maturity increased as fibers matured up until 35 dpa for Upland and 29 dpa for Pima (i.e. the BMI coefficient of variation decreased as BMI increased during fruit development). It is envisaged that SiroMat will be a useful tool in helping to understand and manage fiber maturity by characterizing the maturation dynamics of cultivars with different inherent fiber properties, and for cultivars subjected to different environmental and agronomic conditions.
Wilkins, T.A. , and Jernstedt, J.A., Molecular Genetics of Developing Cotton Fibers, in "Cotton Fibers, Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement, and Textile Processing," Basra, A. (ed), Food Products Press, Binghampton, NY, 1999, pp. 231-269.
2.
Benedict, C.R. , Smith, R.H., and Kohel, R.J., Incorporation of 14C-phoyosynthate into developing cotton bolls Gossypium hirsutum L., Crop Sci. 13, 88-91 (1973).
3.
Schubert, A.M. , Benedict, C.R., Berlin, J.D., and Kohel, R.J., Cotton fiber development kinetics of cell elongation and secondary wall thickening, Crop Sci. 13, 704-709 (1973).
4.
Kohel, R.J., Quinsberry, J.E., and Benedict, C.R., Fiber elongation and dry weight changes in mutant lines of cotton, Crop Sci. 14, 471-474, (1974).
5.
Meinert, M.C. , and Delmer, D.P., Changes in biochemical composition of the cell wall of cotton fiber during development, Plant Physiol . 59, 1097-1099 (1977).
6.
Ryser, U., Cotton Fiber Initiation and Histodifferentiation, in "Cotton Fibers, Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement, and Textile Processing,"Basra, A. (ed), Food Products Press, Binghampton, NY, 1999, pp. 1-45.
7.
Kerr, T., The structure of the growth rings in the secondary wall of the cotton hair, Protoplasma, Verlag von Gebriider Borntraeger, Leipzig, 1937, pp. 229-241.
8.
Maxwell J.M. , Gordon, S.G., and Huson, M.G., Internal structure of mature and immature cotton fibers revealed by scanning probe microscopy, Textile Res J. 73, 1005-1012 (2003).
9.
Gipson, J.R. , and Ray, L.L., Fiber elongation rates in five varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as influenced by night temperature, Crop Sci. 9, 339-341 (1969).
10.
Wang, Q., Sun, X., Song, X., Guo, Y.Li, Y., Chen, S.Y., and Wang, Z., Effect of shading at different stages of cotton bolls on cotton fiber quality . Acta Agronomica Sinica32, 671-675 (2006).
11.
Van der Sluijs, M.H.J., and Hunter , L., Neps in cotton lint , Textil. Progr.28, 1-51 (1999).
12.
Behery, H.M., "Short Fiber Content and Uniformity Index in Cotton," CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, 1993.
13.
Anthony, W.S. , and Mayfield, W.D., "Cotton Ginners Handbook - Agricultural Handbook number 503,"United States Department of Agriculture , Washington, DC, 1994.
14.
Lord, E., and Heap, S.A., "The Origin and Assessment of Cotton Fiber Maturity," International Institute for Cotton, Manchester, 1988.
15.
Thibodeaux, D.P., and Rajasekaran , K., Development of new reference standards for cotton fiber maturity, J. Cotton Sci . 3, 188-193 (1999).
16.
Hequet, E.F. , Wyatt, B., Abidi, N., and Thibodeaux , D.P., Creation of a set of reference material for cotton fiber maturity measurements, Textile Res. J. 76, 576-586, (2006).
17.
Nawar, M.T., Khalifa, B.A., and Al-Ganainy, G., Crystallinity, crystallite size, fine structural and physical fiber properties at two fiber maturity levels in two Egyptian cotton cultivars, in "Proceedings of the 1st World Cotton Research Conference", Brisbane Australia, 1994, pp. 258-263.
18.
Hsieh, Y-L., Chemical structure and properties of cotton, in "Cotton: Science and Technology" , Gordon, S., and Hsieh, Y-L. (eds), Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, 2007, pp. 3-34.
19.
Gamble, G., Variation in surface chemistry constituents of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber as a function of maturity, J. Agric. Food Chem, 51, 7995-7998 (2003).
20.
Schubert, A.M. , Benedict, C.R., Gates, C.E., and Kohel, R.J., Growth and development of the lint fibers of Pima S-4 cotton, Crop Sci. 16, 539-543 ( 1976).
21.
Seagull, R.W. , Oliveri, V., Murphy, K., Binder, A., and Kothari, S., Cotton fiber growth and development. 2. Changes in cell diameter and wall birefringence, J. Cotton Sci. 4, 97-104 (2000).
22.
Bradow, J.M. , Hinojosa, O., Wartelle, L.H., Davidonis, G., Sassenrath-Cole , G.F., and Bauer, P.J., Applications of AFIS fineness and maturity module and x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy in fiber maturity evaluation, Textile Res. J. 66, 545-554 (1996).
23.
Gordon, S.G., and Phair, N.L.P., An investigation of the interference colors in mature and immature cotton fibers, in "Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences", National Cotton Council, New Orleans LA, 2005.
24.
Hecht, E., "Optics", 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley , Reading, Massachusetts, 1987.
25.
Schwarz, E.R. , and Hotte, G.H., Micro-determination of cotton fiber maturity in polarized light, Textile Res. J. 5(8), 370- 376 (1935).
26.
Grimes, M.A. , Polarized Light: Preferred for Maturity Tests , Textile World, 161-163, February (1945).
27.
American Society for Testing and Materials Designation: D1442-00, ‘Standard Test Method for Maturity of Cotton Fibers (Sodium Hydroxide Swelling and Polarized Light Procedures)’ , 2000, pp. 354-359.
28.
Peirce, F.T. , and Lord, E., The fineness and maturity of cotton, J. Textile Inst. 30, T173-T210, ( 1939).
29.
Singh, B., Avci, U., Eichler Inwood, S.E., Grimson, M.J., Landgraf, J., Mohnen, D., Sorensen, I., Wilkerson, C.G., Willats, W.G.T., and Haigler, C.H., A specialized outer layer of the primary cell wall joins elongating cotton fibers into tissue-like bundles, Plant Physiol.150, 684-6992009.
30.
Hsieh, Y-L., Structural development of cotton fibers and linkages to fiber quality, in "Cotton Fibers, Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement, and Textile Processing," Basra, A. (ed), Food Products Press, Binghampton, NY, 1999, pp. 137- 165.
31.
Gordon, S.G., Long, R.L., Bange, M., Lucas, S.R., and Phair-Sorensen, N.L., Measurement of average maturity and maturity distribution statistics by SiroMat in cotton fiber subject to differential defoliation timing treatments, in "Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences", National Cotton Council, New Orleans LA, 2007.
32.
Gordon, S.G., Long, R.L., Lucas, S.R., and Phair-Sorensen, N.L., Using SiroMat to distinguish fiber maturity related issues in the mill, in "Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences", National Cotton Council, Nashville TN, 2008.
