This study evaluated the performance of multilayer perceptron (MLP) and multivariate linear regression (MLR) models for predicting the hairiness of worsted-spun wool yarns from various top, yarn and processing parameters. The results indicated that the MLP model predicted yarn hairiness more accurately than the MLR model, and should have wide mill specific applications. On the basis of sensitivity analysis, the factors that affected yarn hairiness significantly included yarn twist, ring size, average fiber length (hauteur), fiber diameter and yarn count, with twist having the greatest impact on yarn hairiness.
Goswami, B.C. , Martindale, J.G., and Scardino , F.L., "Textile Yarns: Technology, Structure, and Applications," Wiley-Interscience , New York, USA (1977).
2.
Kenins, P., Influence of Fiber Type and Moisture on Measured Fabric-to-skin Friction , Textile Res. J. 64(12), 722-728 (1994).
3.
Namboodri, C.G. , Foam Sizing of Cotton and Blend Yarns: Slashing Trial, Textile Res. J. 56(2), 87-92 (1986).
4.
Naylor, G.R.S. , Phillips, D.G., and Veitch, C.J., Fabric-evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics - Part 3: Wear Trial Studies of Absolute Fabric Acceptability , Textile Res. J. 67(6), 413-416 (1997).
5.
Peykamian, S. , and Rust, J.P., Yarn Quality Indexing Using a Mechanical Stylus, Textile Res. J. 69(6), 394-400 (1999).
6.
Plate, D.E.A. , and Lappage, J., An Alternative Approach to Twofold Weaving Yarn - Part 1: Control of Surface Fibres, J. Textile Inst . 73(3), 99-106 (1982).
7.
Slauson, S.D. , Miller, B., and Rebenfeld, L., Physicochemical Properties of Sized Yarns , Textile Res. J. 54(10), 655-664 (1984).
8.
Tanaka, K., On Fuzz of Spun Yarns, J. Textile Mach. Soc. Jpn. 12(4), 147-155 (1966).
9.
Tanaka, K., Effect of the Structure of Spun Yarns and Fabrics on their Fuzz, J. Textile Mach. Soc. Jpn. 13(3), 81-89 (1967).
10.
Vincent, J.J. , and Robinson, D.M., The Sizing of Singles Worsted Warp Yarn , Textile Inst. Ind. 9, 181-184 (1971).
11.
Boswell, H.R. , and Townend, P.P., Some Factors Affecting the Hairiness of Worsted Yarns, J. Textile Inst. 48, T135-T142 (1957).
12.
Hunter, L., The Hairiness of Wool Worsted Single Yarns, SAWTRI Tech. Rep . 350, 1-13 (1977).
13.
Ukidve, A.V. , Munshi, P.K., and Viswanathan , G., Studies on Spectrum Density Analysis of Yarn Hairiness Variation, Indian J. Fibre Textile Res. 20(6), 92-96 (1995).
14.
Lamb, P.R., and Yang, S., Choosing the Right Top for Spinning, in "Proceedings of Top-tech '96 Conference at CSIRO," Geelong, Australia, pp. 258-276 (1996).
15.
Beltran, R., Wang, L., and Wang, X., Predicting Worsted Spinning Performance with an Artificial Neural Network Model, Textile Res. J. 74(9), 757-763 (2004).
16.
Beltran, R. , Wang, L., and Wang, X., Mill Specific Prediction of Worsted Yarn Performance, J. Textile Inst. 97(1), 11-16 (2006).
17.
Haykin, S., "Neural Networks: a Comprehensive Foundation," Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA ( 1994).
18.
Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., and Williams, R., Learning Representations by Backpropagation Errors, Nature323, 533-536 (1986).
19.
Barella, A., Yarn Hairiness, Textile Prog. 13(1), 1-61 (1983).
