Two differently finished woolen fabrics yield pressure-thickness curves to maxi mum pressures of 35, 50, and 70 gf/cm2. Compressional property values and subjec tive hand rankings are analyzed according to the finish types. Most compressional property values differ according to the finish and the maximum pressure. Subjective springiness differs according to finish type, while subjective fullness, hardness, and thickness do not differ. Predicted models for the subjective hand rankings are calculated from the compressional property values, fabric weight, and finish types through multiple stepwise regression. The coefficient of determination ranges from 0.90 through 0.97.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ASTM D 1777, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
2.
Bogaty, H., Monego, C.J., and Hollies, N.R.S., Blends of Wool Type Fabrics, Textile Ser. Rept. No. 98, Textile, Clothing and Footwear Div., Quartermaster R. and Eng. Center, Natick, MA, PB136 730, Aug. 1958.
3.
Bogaty, H., Hollies, N.R.S., Hintermaier, J.C., and Harris, M., The Nature of a Fabric Surface: Thickness-Pressure Relationships, Textile Res. J.23, 108-114 (1953).
4.
Dupuis, D., Popov, G., and Viallier, P., Compression of Greystate Fabrics as a Function of Yam Structure, Textile Res. J.65 (6), 309-316 (1995).
5.
Fourt, L., and Hollies, N.R.S., Physical Properties of Clothing and Comfort, ch. 6 in " Clothing; Comfort and Function," Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, 1970.
6.
Hollies, N.R.S., The Nature of a Fabric Surface; Interaction of the Surface Fibers , paper presented to the Fiber Society, Montreal , Canada, Oct. 22, 1964.
7.
Jacobsen, M. , Frits, A., Dhingra , R., and Postle, R., A Psychophysical Evaluation of the Tactile Qualities of Hand Knitting Yarns, Textile Res. J.62 (10), 557-566 (1992).
8.
Kawabata, S., "The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation," 2nd ed., Textile Machinery Society of Japan , Osaka, 1980.
9.
Kim, J.O., and Slaten, B.L., Objective Evaluation of Fabric Hand, Part I, Textile Res. J.69 (1), 59-67 (1999).
10.
Kothari, V.K. , and Das, A. TheCompressional Behavior of Spunbonded Nonwoven Fabrics, J. Textile Inst.84 (1), 16-30 (1993).
11.
Matsudaira, M., and Quin, H., Features andMechanical Parameters of a Fabric's Compressional Property, J. Textile Inst.86 (3), 476-486 (1995).
12.
Pan, N., Yen, K.C., Zhao, S.J., and Yang, S.R., A. NewApproach to the Objective Evaluation of Fabric Hand from Mechanical Properties, Part I, Textile Res. J.58, 438-443 ( 1988).
13.
Radhakrishnaiah, P., Tejatanalert, S., and Sawhney, A.P.S., Hand and Comfort Properties of Woven Fabrics Made from Random Blend and Cotton-Covered Cotton/ Polyester Yarns , Textile Res. J.63, 573-579 (1993).
14.
Radhakrishnaiah, P., and Sawhney, A.P.S., LowStress Mechanical Behavior of Cotton/Polyester Yams and Fabrics in Relation to Fiber Distribution Within the Yam, Textile Res. J.66 (2), 99-103 (1996).
15.
Schiefer, H.F. , The Compressometer, an Instrument for Evaluating the Thickness, Compressibility, and Compressional Resilience of Textiles and Similar Materials, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std.10, 705-713 (1933).
16.
Subramaniam, V., A Simple Method of Measuring the Hand of Fabrics and Softness of Yams, J. Textile Inst.81 (1), 94-96 (1990).
17.
Subramaniam, V., and Mohamed, A.P., Compressional Behavior of Double-rove Yarns , J. Textile Inst.84 (2), 214-220 (1993).
18.
Weedall, P.J. , Harwood, R.J., and Shaw, N., AnAssessment of Kawabata Transformation Equations for Primary-Hand Values, J. Textile Inst.86 (3), 470-475 (1995).
19.
Yokura, H., and Niwa, M., Objective Hand Evaluation of Nonwovens Used for Nappies, Int. J. Cloth . Sci. Technol.9 (3), 207-213( 1997).
