AndersP., & PrichardG. (1993). Integrated language curriculum and instruction for the middle grades. Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 611–614.
2.
BottgeB., & HasselbringT. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 556–545.
3.
CawleyJ. (1985). Cognition and learning disabilities. Rockville, MD: Aspen.*
4.
EnglertC.RaphaelT., & AndersonL. (1992). Socially mediated instruction: Improving students' knowledge and talk about writing. Elementary School Journal, 92(4), 411–449.
5.
HiebertJ., & CarpenterT. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In GrouwsD. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics research and teaching (pp. 65–100). New York: Macmillian.*
6.
MontagueM. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 230–248.
7.
PalincsarA.AndersonC., & DavidY. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 643–659.
8.
WoodwardJ.BaxterJ., & RobinsonR. (in press). Rules and reasons: Decimal instruction for academically low achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
9.
WoodwardJ.BaxterJ., & ScheelC. (1997). It's what you take for granted when you take nothing for granted; The problems with general principles of instructional design. In ScruggsT. & MastropieriM. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disorders (Vol. 11, pp. 199–234). New York: JAI Press.*