American Testronics. (1989). School Attitude Measure (Assessment Instrument). Chicago: Author.
2.
BlackorbyJ., & WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinat postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children. 62(5), 399–413.
3.
BruininksR. H.ThurlowM. L.LewisD. R. & LarsonN. W. (1988). Post school outcomes for students in special education and other students on to eight years alter high school. In BrmnmksR. H.LewisD. R., & ThurlowJ. L. (Eds). Assessing outcomes, costs and benefits of special education programs (pp. 109–111). Minneapolis; University of Minnesota. University Affiliated Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 639).
4.
NalinButler P.MarderC., & ShaverD. M. (1989). Making the transition: An explanaitory model of special education students' participation in post-secondary educationMenlo Park, CA: SRI (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 991).
5.
The Council for Exceptional Children. (1994). Statistical profile of special education in the United Slates. TEACHING Exceptional Children. 26(3), 1–4.
6.
EllisE. S.DeshlerD. D.LenzB. K.SchumakerJ. B., & ClarkF. L. (1991). An instructional model for leaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children. 23(4), 1–24.
7.
GartnerA., & LipskyD. K. (1989. June). Equity and excellence for all students. The education of students with disabilities Where do we stand: Briefing paper for testimony given at hearing conducted by the National Council for the Handicapped. Washington, DC.
8.
HalpernA. (1992). Transition: Old wine in new bottles. Exceptional Children. 58(3), 202–211.
9.
National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1993). Transition services in the IEP. Transition Summary. 3(1), 1–19.
10.
OwingsJ., & StockingC. (1986). High school and beyond, a longitudinal study for the 1980s: Characteristics of high school students who identify themselves as handicapped. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 260 546).
11.
PhillipsP. (1990) A self-advocacy plan for high school students with learning disabilities: A comparative case study analysis of students', teachers', and parents' perceptions of program effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 23, 466–471.
12.
Psy-Ed. Corp. (1994). Students with disabilities in regular classes. Exceptional Parent. 24(2), 59.
13.
SillingtonP. L., & FrankA. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly13, 97–111.
14.
Van ReusenA. K.DeshlerD. D., & SchumakerJ. B. (1989). Effects of a student participation strategy in facilitating the involvement of adolescents with learning disabilities in the individualized educational program planning process. Learning Disabilities. 1(2), 23–24.
15.
ZetlinA., & HosseniniA. (1989). Six postschool case studies of mildly learning handicapped young adults. Exceptional Children. 55(5), 405–411.