BaerD. M.WolfM. M., & RisleyT. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.
2.
BannermanD. J.SheldonJ. B.ShermanJ. A., & HarchikA. E. (1990). Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: The rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and lake a nap. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 79–89.
3.
BaumgartD.BrownL.PumpianI.NisbethJ.FordA.SweetM.MessinaR., & SchroederJ. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 17–27.
4.
BrownF. (1991). Creative daily scheduling: A nonintrusive approach to challenging behaviors in community residents. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 75–84.
5.
BrownF.EvansI. M.WeedK., & OwenV. (1987). Delineating functional competencies: A component model. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 117–124.
6.
BrownF., & LehrD. (Eds.). (1989). Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
BrownL.LongE.Udvari-SolnerA.DavisL.VanDeventerP.AhlgrenC.JohnsonF.GruenewaldL., & JorgensenJ. (1989). The home school: Why students with severe intellectual disabilities must attend the schools of their brothers, sisters, friends and neighbors. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 1–7.
8.
BrownL.LongE.Udvari-SolnerA.SchwarzP.VanDeventerP.AhlgrenC.JohnsonF.GruenewaldL., & JorgensenJ. (1989). Should students with severe intellectual disabilities be based in regular or in special education classrooms in home schools?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 8–12.
9.
CarrE. G., & DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
10.
DossL. S., & ReichleJ. (1989). Establishing communicative alternatives to the emission of socially motivated excess behavior: A review. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 101–112.
11.
EvansI. M., & ScottiJ. R. (1989). Defining meaningful outcomes for persons with profound disabilities. In BrownF. & LehrD. (Eds.), Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices (pp. 83–108). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
ForestM., & LusthausE. (1989). Promoting educational equality for all students. Circles and maps. In StainbackS.StainbackW., & ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43–57). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
HaringT. G., & BreenC. (1989). Units of analysis of social interaction outcomes in supported education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 255–262.
14.
HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R.O'BrienJ., & HeathfieldL. T. (1990). The role of response efficiency in the reduction of problem behaviors through functional equivalence training: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 91–97.
15.
KazdinA. E. (1976). Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In HersenM. & BarlowD. (Eds.), Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (pp. 265–316). New York: Pergamon.
16.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–451.
17.
MeyerL. H., & EvansI. M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
MeyerL. H.St. PeterS., & Park-LeeS. (1986, November). The validation of social skills for successful performance in community environments by young adults with moderate to severe/profound disabilities. Paper presented at the 20th annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago.
19.
SailorW.GeeK.GoetzL., & GrahamN. (1988). Progress in educating students with the most severe disabilities: Is there any?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 87–99.
20.
VoeltzL. M., & EvansI. M. (1983). Educational validity: Procedures to evaluate outcomes in programs for severely handicapped learners. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 3–15.
21.
WolfM. M. (1978), Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or How behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.