DunnL. M., & MarkwardtF. C.Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service, 1970.
2.
HanauL.The study game: How to play and win with statement-pie. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1974.
3.
HansenC. L.Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 1978, 1, 62–69.
4.
HuhnR. H.Readiness as a variable influencing comprehension in content-area reading at the secondary level: A cognitive view. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3(4), 29–33.
5.
JenkinsJ. R.SteinM.OsbornJ. R.What next after decoding? Instruction and research in reading comprehension. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1981, 2 (1), 27–39.
6.
MannL.GoodmanL., & WiederholtJ. L.Teaching the learning-disabled adolescent. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1978.
7.
MercerC. D., & SnellM. E.Learning theory research in mental retardation: Implications for teaching. Columbus OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1977.
8.
MeyerB. J.BrandtD. M., & BluthG. J.Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 1980, 16(1), 72–103.
WongB. Y.Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979, 2, 42–47.
11.
WongB. Y.Activating the inactive learner. Use of questions/prompts to enhance comprehension and retention of implied information in learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3, 29–37.