Pushing Past the Paywall: Accessing Open Peer-Reviewed Research

Abstract

Effective teaching and special education programming should be informed by scientific research published in peer-reviewed journals. However, many peer-reviewed articles, including how-to articles based on research findings in practitioner-focused journals, are not freely accessible to instructional coaches, department chairs, special education administrators, special education teachers, families of students with disabilities, and other interested individuals, creating a significant obstacle to informing practice with research findings. Fortunately, the number of peer-reviewed articles that are openly accessible on the internet is growing. In this article, we describe types of peer-reviewed articles, discuss different types of open-access publishing, and provide a six-step approach for accessing open-access publications.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cavanaugh

R. A.

Heward

W. L.

Donelson

(1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(3), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-403

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2016). Research designs and special education research: Different designs address different questions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(4), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12110

Cook

B. G.

Farley

(2019). The research-to-practice gap in special education. In Bateman

D. F.

Yell

M. L.

(Eds.), Current trends and legal issues in special education (pp. 110–125). Corwin.

Cook

B. G.

Smith

G. J.

Tankersley

(2012). Evidence-based practices in education. In Harris

K. R.

Graham

Urdan

(Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, (Vol.1, pp. 495–528). American Psychological Association.

Cook

B. G.

Landrum

T. J.

Tankersley

(2008). Examining the role of group experimental research in establishing evidenced-based practices. Intervention in School & Clinic, 44(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208324504

Davis

L. L.

O’Neill

R. E.

(2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(2), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-21

Didion

L. A.

Toste

J. R.

Wehby

J. H.

(2020). Response cards to increase engagement and active participation of middle school students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 41(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518800807

Duffin

K. I.

(2020). Comparing open access search tools to improve interlibrary loan fulfillment efficiency. Technical Services Quarterly, 37(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2020.1810442

Fleming

J. I.

Cook

B. G

. (2022). Open access in special education: A review of journal and publisher policies. Remedial and Special Education, 43(1), 3–14. https://doi.org.10.1177/0741932521996461

10.

Gadd

Morrison

Secker

(2019). The impact of open access on teaching—How far have we come? Publications, 7(3), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030056

11.

Google. (2023). In-depth guide to how Google Search works. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/how-search-works

12.

Google Scholar. (n.d.). Content guidelines. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html#content

13.

Gusenbauer

(2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5

14.

Heward

W. L.

Gardner

III Cavanaugh

R. A.

Courson

F. H.

Grossi

T. A.

Barbetta

P. M.

(1996). Everyone participates in this class: Using response cards to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999602800201

15.

Holland

(2023). How to read and interpret research to benefit your teaching practice. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-research-improve-teaching/

16.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2004).

17.

Janda

Khetpal

Shi

Ross

J. S.

Wallach

J. D.

(2022). Comparison of clinical study results reported in medRxiv preprints vs peer-reviewed journal articles. JAMA Network Open, 5(12), Article e2245847. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45847

18.

Lambert

M. C.

Cartledge

Heward

W. L.

Y. Y.

(2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080020701

19.

Maggin

D. M.

Chafouleas

S. M.

Berggren

Sugai

(2013). A systematic appraisal of peer review guidelines for special education journals. Exceptionality, 21(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.747181

20.

Maggin

D. M.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2018). Using single-case research designs to examine the effects of interventions in special education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12184

21.

Marsh

R. J.

Cumming

T. M.

Randolph

J. J.

Michaels

(2021). Updated meta-analysis of the research on response cards. Journal of Behavioral Education, 32, 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09463-0

22.

NYU Libraries. (2023). Applying fair use. https://guides.nyu.edu/fairuse

23.

OA.Works. (2017). Making more research open access one paper at a time. https://blog.oa.works/making-more-research-open-access-one-paper-at-a-time/

24.

Open Access Button. (n.d.). About. https://openaccessbutton.org/about

25.

Odom

S. L.

Brantlinger

Gersten

Horner

R. H.

Thompson

Harris

K. R.

(2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201

26.

Owiny

R. L.

Spriggs

A. D.

Sartini

E. C.

Mills

J. R.

(2018). Evaluating response cards as evidence based. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1344953

27.

Pinkelman

S. E.

McIntosh

Rasplica

C. K.

Berg

Strickland-Cohen

M. K.

(2015). Perceived enablers and barriers related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Behavioral Disorders, 40(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.3.171

28.

Piwowar

Priem

Larivière

Alperin

J. P.

Matthias

Norlander

Farley

West

Haustein

(2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, Article e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375

29.

ResearchGate. (n.d.). About ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/about

30.

Roy

B. K.

Mukhopadhyay

(2022). Digital access brokers: Clustering and comparison (part I–locator services). SRELS Journal of Information Management, 59(5), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i5/168622

31.

Schultz

T. A.

Azadbakht

Bull

Bucy

Floyd

(2019). Assessing the effectiveness of open access finding tools. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(3), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i3.11009

32.

Schwab

J. R.

Tucci

Jolivette

(2013). Integrating schema-based instruction and response cards for students with learning disabilities and challenging behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 22(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561302200304

33.

Singh

V. K.

Srichandan

S. S.

Lathabai

H. H.

(2022). ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why? Scientometrics, 127, 1515–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04264-2

34.

Tennant

J. P.

(2018). The state of the art in peer review. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(19), Article fny204. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny204

35.

Test

D. W.

Kemp-Inman

Diegelmann

Hitt

S. B.

Bethune

(2015). Are online sources for identifying evidence-based practices trustworthy? An evaluation. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585477

36.

Therrien

W. J.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2020). Utilizing meta-analyses to guide practice: A primer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12230

37.

Wintec. (2023). Research skills for health: Search strategies and using PICO. https://libguides.wintec.ac.nz/c.php?g=937184&p=6779189