Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Algebra Problem Solving

Abstract

In the era of 21st century learning, many secondary students with learning disabilities continue to struggle with mathematics problem solving. Emerging evidence suggests self-regulated strategy development can be combined with existing evidence-based and promising practices during mathematics instruction. These practices include explicit instruction, metacognition, use of visual representations, ongoing formative assessment and feedback, multiple examples, and self-regulation. We describe the promising and practical potential of SRSD and STAR, a research-based, metacognitive problem-solving strategy, for instruction in algebraic problem-solving. A practical example is provided to illustrate the combination of practices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bone

Bouck

Witmer

(2021). Evidence-based systematic review of literature on algebra instruction and interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 19, 1–22.

Bouck

E. C.

Satsangi

Park

(2018). The concrete–representational–abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712

Cook

B. G.

Collins

L. W.

Cook

S. C.

Cook

(2020). Evidence-based reviews: How evidence-based practices are systematically identified. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 35, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12213

Cuenca-Carlino

Freeman-Green

Stephenson

G. W.

Hauth

(2016). Self-regulated strategy development for teaching multi-step equations to middle school students struggling in math. The Journal of Special Education, 50(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466915622021

Education Commission of the States. (2019). 50 state comparison: High school graduation requirements. https://www.ecs.org/high-school-graduation-requirements/

Every Student Succeeds Act (2015). P.L. 114-95. https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf

Frost

B. R. T.

(2018). The impact of STARS mnemonic strategy instruction on algebra test scores for students with math deficits [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Johns Hopkins University.

Gagnon

J. C.

Barber

B. R.

(2015). Research-based academic and behavioral practices in alternative education settings: Best evidence, challenges, and recommendations. In Cook

B. G.

Tankersley

Landrum

T. J.

(Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 28, pp. 225–271). Emerald Group Publishing.

Harris

K. R.

Graham

Santangelo

(2013). Self-regulated strategies development in writing: Development, implementation, and scaling up. In Bembenutty

Cleary

T. J.

Kitsantas

(Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines (pp. 59–87). Information Age Publishing.

10.

Hughes

E. M.

Lee

Cook

M. J.

Riccomini

P. J.

(2019). Exploratory study of a self-regulation mathematical writing strategy: Proof-of-concept. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17, 185–203.

11.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act 34 C.F.R. pts. 300 and 301 (2006).

12.

Jitendra

A. K.

Corroy

K. C.

Dupuis

D. N.

(2013). Characteristics of students at risk for mathematics difficulties predicting arithmetic word problem solving performance: The role of attention, behavior, and reading. Learning Disabilities, 19(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408

13.

Krawec

J. L

. (2014). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students of varying math ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412436976

14.

Losinski

Ennis

R. P.

Shaw

Gage

N. A.

(2021). Supporting students within an MTSS framework using SRSD fractions: Results of a regression discontinuity design. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 36(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12253

15.

Maccini

(1998). Effects of an instructional strategy incorporating concrete problem representation on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pennsylvania State University.

16.

Maccini

Hughes

C. A.

(2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1501_2

17.

Maccini

Ruhl

K. L.

(2000). Effects of a graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 465–489. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899634

18.

McLeskey

Billingsley

Brownell

M. T.

Maheady

Lewis

T. J.

(2019). What are high-leverage practices for special education teachers and why are they important? Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773477

19.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). NAEP report card: Mathematics. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/nation/groups?grade=4

20.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards.

21.

National Science Board, National Science Foundation. (2019). Elementary and secondary mathematics and science education. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20196/

22.

Özkubat

Karabulut

Uçar

A. S.

(2021). Investigating the effects of STAR strategy in math problem solving. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.332.6

23.

Peltier

Vannest

K. J.

(2016). Utilizing the STAR strategy to improve the mathematical problem-solving abilities of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 25, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561602500103

24.

Popham

Adams

Hodge

(2020). Self-regulated strategy development to teach mathematics problem solving. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(3), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219842197

25.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2013). Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the Common Core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12001

26.

Scheibel

(2023). Addressing barriers to evidence-based practice: Using evidence-based decision making and high-leverage practices to meet student needs. TEACHING Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221143471

27.

Soares

Evans

Patel

D. R.

(2018). Specific learning disability in mathematics: A comprehensive review. Translational Pediatrics, 7(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2017.08.03.

28.

Star

J. R.

Caronongan

Foegen

Furgeson

Keating

Larson

M. R.

Lyskawa

McCallum

W. G.

Porath

Zbiek

R. M.

(2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014-4333). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/docs/practiceguide/wwc_algebra_040715.pdf

29.

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, & What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). WWC intervention report: Self-regulated strategy development. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_srsd_111417.pdf