AboudK. S.BaileyS. K.PetrillS. A.CuttingL. E. (2016). Comprehending text versus reading words in young readers with varying reading ability: Distinct patterns of functional connectivity from common processing hubs. Developmental Science, 19, 632–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12422
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
3.
CantrellS. C.BurnsL. D.CallawayP. (2009). Middle- and high-school content area teachers’ perceptions about literacy teaching and learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802434899
4.
CapinP.StevensE. A.StewartA. A.SwansonE.VaughnS. (2021). Examining vocabulary, reading comprehension, and content knowledge instruction during fourth grade social studies teaching. Reading and Writing, 34(5), 1143–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10106-5
5.
CassarA. G.JangE. E. (2010). Investigating the effects of a game-based approach in teaching word recognition and spelling to students with reading disabilities and attention deficits. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404151003796516
6.
ChallJ. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.
7.
DexterD. D. (2010). Graphic organizers and their effectiveness for students with learning disabilities. Thalamus, 26(1), 51–67.
8.
DexterD. D.HughesC. A. (2011). Graphic organizers with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104
9.
EllemanA. M.LindoE. J.MorphyP.ComptonD. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539200
10.
EnnisR. P. (2016). Using self-regulated strategy development to help high school students with EBD summarize informational text in social studies. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0024
11.
GaubM.CarlsonC. L. (1997). Behavioral characteristics of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a school-based population. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 103–111.
12.
GhelaniK.SidhuR.JainU.TannockR. (2004). Reading comprehension and reading related abilities in adolescents with reading disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dyslexia, 10(4), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.285
13.
GropperR. J.TannockR. (2009). A pilot study of working memory and academic achievement in college students with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12, 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708320390
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
15.
HedinL. R.MasonL. H.GaffneyJ. S. (2011). Comprehension strategy instruction for two students with attention-related disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2010.499393
16.
JohnsonJ. W.ReidR.MasonL. H. (2012). Improving the reading recall of high school students with ADHD. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511403502
17.
KendeouP.McMasterK. L.ChristT. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Reading, Writing, and Language, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
18.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.SchummJ. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3–22.
19.
LockeW. R.FuchsL. S. (1995). Effects of peer-mediated reading instruction on the on-task behavior and social interaction of children with behavior disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669500300204
MartinussenR.MackenzieG. (2015). Reading comprehension in adolescents with ADHD: Exploring the poor comprehender profile and individual differences in vocabulary and executive functions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.007
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2021). The nation’s report card: Reading 2019. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grade 4. U.S. Department of Education.
24.
PhamA. V. (2016). Differentiating behavioral ratings of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity in children: Effects on reading achievement. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(8), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712473833
25.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. RAND.
26.
RogevichM. E.PerinD. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400201
27.
RowlandA. S.SkipperB. J.UmbachD. M.RabinerD. L.CampellR. A.NaftelA. J.SandlerD. P. (2015). The prevalence of ADHD in a population-based sample. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19(9), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713513799
28.
SaddlerB.Asaro-SaddlerK.MoeyaertM.Ellis-RobinsonT. (2017). Effects of a summarizing strategy on written summaries of children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516669051
29.
SimmonsD.HairrellA.EdmondsM.VaughnS.LarsenR.RillsonV.RubleyW.ByrnsG. (2010). A comparison of multiple-strategy methods: Effects on fourth-grade students’ general and content-specific reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(2), 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345741003596890
30.
StevensE. A.ParkS.VaughnS. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940
31.
StewartA. A.AustinC. R. (2020). Reading interventions for students with or at risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review. Remedial and Special Education, 41(6), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519849660
32.
StewartA. A.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.SwansonE. (2022). Exploring the efficacy of evidence-based instruction on the reading outcomes of students with inattention [Manuscript submitted for publication]. The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, University of Texas at Austin.
33.
SwansonE.BarnesM.FallA. M.RobertsG. (2018). Predictors of reading comprehension among struggling readers who exhibit differing levels of inattention and hyperactivity. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 132–146.
34.
SwansonE.StevensE. A.WexlerJ. (2019). Engaging students with disabilities in text-based discussions: Guidance for general education social studies classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991982603
35.
SwansonE.StewartA. A.StevensE. A.ScammaccaN. K.CapinP.HamiltonB. J.RobertsG.VaughnS. (2021). The efficacy of two models of professional development mediated by fidelity on fourth grade student reading outcomes. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/7kqrt
36.
SwansonE. A.WexlerJ.VaughnS. (2009). Text reading and students with learning disabilities. In HiebertE. H. (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 210–230). Guilford.
37.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563704
38.
TaylorJ.VillanuevaM. G. (2014). The power of multimodal representations. Science and Children, 51(5), 60–65.
39.
U.S. Census Bureau, Associate Director of Demographic Programs, National Survey of Children’s Health. (2017). 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health frequently asked questions. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/data/national-surveys/data-user
40.
WillcuttE. G. (2012). The prevalence of DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity distorder: A meta-analytic review. Neurotherapeutics, 9(3), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-012-0135-8
41.
ZhaoY.HogeJ. D. (2005). What elementary students and teachers say about social studies. The Social Studies, 96(5), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.96.5.216-221