Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-1
Tootling: A Classwide Peer-Mediated Intervention for Decreasing Antisocial and Disruptive Behavior and Enhancing Prosocial Behaviors and Academic Engagement
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient learning. Guilford Press.
2.
CampbellS.SkinnerC. H. (2004). Combining explicit timing with interdependent group contingency program to decrease transition times: An investigation of the timely transitions game. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10/1300/J370v20n02_02
3.
CashwellT. H.SkinnerC. H.SmithE. S. (2001). Increasing second-grade students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors via direct instruction, group reinforcement, and progress feedback: A replication and extension. Education & Treatment of Children, 24(2), 161–175.
4.
CihakD. F.KirkE. R.BoonR. T. (2009). Effects of class-wide positive peer “Tootling” to reduce the disruptive classroom behaviors of elementary students with and without disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(4), 267–278. https://10.1007/s10864-009-9091-8
Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center. (2015). High-leverage practices in special education. CEC.
7.
CrewdsonM.RichardsonR. D. (2021, March). Tootling: Modifications to enhance social skills outcomes and classroom behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Tennessee Association for School Psychologists, online.
ErvinR. A.JohnstonE. S.FrimanP. C. (1998). Feed the hungry bee: Positive peer reporting to improve the social interactions of a socially rejected girl. Proven Practice: Prevention and Remediation Solutions for School Problems, 1, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29.251
10.
FudgeD. L.SkinnerC. H.WilliamsJ. L.CowdenD.ClarkJ.BlissS. L. (2008). Increasing on-task behavior in every student in a second-grade classroom during transitions: Validating the color wheel system. Journal of School Psychology, 46(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.003
GreshamF. M.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700303
13.
HarchikA. E.HarchikA. J.LuceS. C.ShermanJ. A. (1990). Teaching autistic and severely handicapped children to recruit praise: Acquisition and generalization. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(90)90006-T
14.
HrydowyE. R.StokesT. F.MartinG. L. (1984). Training elementary students to prompt teacher praise. Education and Treatment of Children, 7(2), 99–108.
15.
JacquettC.SkinnerC. H.MooreT.RyanK.McCurdyM.CihakD. (2020). Interdependent group rewards: Rewarding on-task behavior versus academic performance in an eighth-grade classroom serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders, 46(4), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920934006
16.
KampsD.WillsH. P.Heitzman-PowellL.LaylinJ.SzokeC.PetrilloT.CuleyA. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711398935
17.
KirkpatrickB. A.GibbonsSDanielsS.TaylorK. L. H.McCurdyM.SkinnerC. H. (2019). Tootling in a third-grade after-school classroom: Decreasing antisocial interactions in at-risk students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21, 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719851226
18.
LambertA. M.TingstromD. H.SterlingH. E.DufreneB. A.LynneS. (2015). Effects of Tootling on class-wide disruptive and appropriate behavior of upper-elementary students. Behavior Modification, 39(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514566506
19.
LumJ. D. K.RadleyK. C.TingstromD. H.DufreneB. A.OlmiS. J.WrightS. J. (2019). Tootling with a randomized independent group contingency to improve high school class-wide behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718792663
20.
LumJ. D. K.TingstromD. H.DufreneB. A.RadleyK. C.LynneS. (2017). Effects of Tootling on class-wide disruptive and academically engaged behavior of general-education high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 54(4), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22002
21.
McCurdyM.SkinnerC. H.IgnacioP.Van MarrenV. (2018). The timely transitions game: Occasioning efficient transitions. In HawkinsR.NaborsL. (Eds.), Promoting prosocial behaviors in children through games and play: Making social emotional learning fun (pp. 29–62). Nova Science.
22.
McCurdyMSkinnerC. H.McClurgV.WhitsittL.MooreT. (2020). Bonus rewards for everyone: Enhancing mathematics performance with supplemental interdependent group contingencies. Preventing School Failure, 64(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1678008
23.
McHughM. B.TingstromD. H.RadleyK. C.BarryC. T.WalkerK. M. (2016). Effects of Tootling on class-wide and individual disruptive and academically engaged behavior of lower-elementary students. Behavioral Interventions, 31(4), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1447
24.
MooreL. A.WaguespackA. M.WickstromK. F.WittJ. C.GaydosG. R. (1994). Mystery motivator: An effective and time efficient intervention. School Psychology Review, 23(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/101080/02796015.1994.12085698
25.
MorrisseyK. L.BohanonH.FenningP. (2010). Positive behavior support: Teaching and acknowledging expected behaviors in an urban high school. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200503
26.
PopkinJ.SkinnerC. H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015/2003.12086199
27.
RichardsonR. D.CrewdsonM.SkinnerC. H.WheatL. S.MartinezJ. (2021). Interdependent group-oriented contingencies: Randomly selected components to the rescue. TEACHING Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211006129
28.
RosethC. J.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
29.
ScottK. C.SkinnerC. H.MooreT. C.McCurdyM.CiancioD.CihakD. (2017). Evaluating and comparing the effects of group contingencies on mathematics accuracy in a first-grade classroom: Class average criteria versus unknown small-group average criteria. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0037.V46-3
30.
SeymourF. W.StokesT. F. (1976). Self-recording in training girls to increase work and evoke staff praise in an institution for offenders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-41
31.
SheridanB. A.MacdonaldD. A.McGovernK.DonlonM.KuhnB.FriedmanH. (2011). Evaluation of a social skills program based on social learning theory implemented in a school setting. Psychological Reports, 108(2), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.11.17.PR0.108.2.420-436
32.
SimpsonJ.LewisT. J. (2021). Peer-mediated social skills training. In CollinsT.HawkinsR. (Eds.), Peers as change agents: A guide to implementing peer-mediated interventions in schools (pp. 127–136). Oxford University Press.
SkinnerC.NeddenriepC.RobinsonS.ErvinR.JonesK. (2002). Altering educational environments through positive peer reporting: Prevention and remediation of social problems associated with behavior disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10030
35.
SkinnerC. H.WatsonT. S. (1993). Lotteries in the classroom. Legends, 15(1), 2–3.
36.
SlavinR. E.CooperR. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learning from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00140
37.
VanMaarenV. G.DanielsS. K.IgnacioP. L.McCurdyM.SkinnerC. H. (2020). Reducing hallway disruptions in elementary students using a modified Timely Transitions game. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 22(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719857187
38.
Van RyzinM. J.RosethC. J.McClureH. (2020). The effects of cooperative learning on peer relations, academic support, and engagement in learning among students of color. Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1806016
39.
WrightS.SkinnerC. H.CrewdsonM.MooreT.McCurdyM.ColemanM. B.RocconiL. M. (in press). Using a tootling intervention to sequentially enhance and maintain at-risk elementary students’ performance of multiple social skills. School Psychology.
40.
WrightS.SkinnerC. H.KirkpatrickB. A.DanielsS.MooreT.CrewdsonM. (2021). Using Tootling to enhance first-grade students use of a social skill: Evaluating the Catching Compliments game. Education and Treatment of Children. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00039-1