Central to positive learning outcomes for students with disabilities is the ability of the individualized education program (IEP) team to work collaboratively. Within the IEP team, effective service delivery involves direct and related service providers working in an interdisciplinary capacity as they share professional responsibilities to implement the student’s program and achieve the common goal of improved student outcomes. With support from the literature, this paper discusses the core components of Bronstein’s Interdisciplinary Collaboration Model (2003); and elucidates how professionals share their content knowledge and technical skills with each other, collaborate in instructional design, and gain a firm understanding of each other’s discipline in practice. Practical applications that promote interdisciplinary collaboration between adapted physical educators, special educators, related service providers, and parents to improve service delivery and learner outcomes are shared.
AndersonE. M. (2013). Preparing the next generation of early childhood teachers: The emerging role of interprofessional education and collaboration in teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(1), 23–35.
3.
AuxterD.PyferJ.ZittelL.RothK. (2010). Principles and methods of adapted physical education and recreation (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
4.
BaxterP.Markle-ReidM. (2009). An interprofessional team approach to fall prevention for older home care clients “at risk” of falling: Health care providers share their experiences. International Journal of Integrated Care, 9(28), 1–12.
5.
BronsteinL. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297–306.
6.
BronsteinL. R.AbramsonJ. S. (2003). Understanding socialization of teachers and social workers: Groundwork for collaboration in the schools. Families in Society, 84(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.110
Da FonteM. A.Barton-ArwoodS. M. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 99–106.
9.
D’AmourD.Ferrada-VidelaM.RodriguezL.BeaulieuM. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 116–131.
10.
de OliveiraP. S.van MunsterM. D. A.de SouzaJ. V.LiebermanL. J. (2020). Adapted physical education collaborative consulting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39, 165–175.
11.
DillonS. R.AdamsD.GoudyL.BittnerM.McNamaraS. (2017). Evaluating exercise as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 290.
12.
FriendM.CookL. (2013). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
13.
FriendM.CookL. (2017). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (8th ed.). Pearson.
14.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, U.S.C. 20 §§ 1400 et seq.
15.
KellyL. E. (Ed.). (2019). Adapted physical education national standards (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
16.
MacDonaldM. B.BallyJ. M.FergusonL. M.MurrayB. L.Fowler-KerryS. E.AnonsonJ. M. (2010). Knowledge of the professional role of others: A key interprofessional competency. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(4), 238–242.
17.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.
18.
MellinE. A. (2009). Unpacking interdisciplinary collaboration in expanded school mental health: A conceptual model for developing the evidence base. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 2(3), 4–14.
19.
MellinE. A.BronsteinL.Anderson-ButcherD.AmoroseA. J.BallA.GreenJ. (2010). Measuring interprofessional team collaboration in expanded school mental health: Model refinement and scale development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(5), 514–523.
20.
PfeifferD.PavelkoS.Hahs-VaughnD.DuddingC. (2019). A national survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: Identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 639–655.
21.
RobinsonL.BulyM. R. (2007). Breaking the language barrier: Promoting collaboration between general and special educators. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(3), 83–94.
22.
RonfeldtM.FarmerS. O.McQueenK.GrissomJ. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514.
23.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2017). Making inclusion work with co-teaching. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(4), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685065
24.
ShafferL.Thomas-BrownK. (2015). Enhancing teacher competency through co-teaching and embedded professional development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i3.685
SheridanS. M.ErchulW. P.BrownM. S.DowdS. E.WarnesE. D.MartiD. C., . . .EagleJ. W. (2004). Perceptions of helpfulness in conjoint behavioral consultation: Congruence and agreement between teachers and parents. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.19.2.121.33308
