AlsburyT. L.KobashigawaS.EwartM. (2020). Community-based learning and student outcomes. In KimonenE.NevalainenR. (Eds.), Toward community-based learning (pp. 124–145). Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004424494_003
2.
BarczakM. A. (2019). Simulated and community-based instruction: Teaching students with intellectual and developmental disabilities to make financial transactions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0040059919826035
3.
BassetteL. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. I.AlbertoP.YakubovaG.CihakD. (2018). The use of cell phones to address safety skills for students with a moderate ID in community-based settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088357616667590
4.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932516653477
5.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. H.JimenezB. (2011). Standards-based individualized education plans and progress monitoring. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 42–91). Guilford Press.
6.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932508324399
7.
FildermanM. J.AustinC. R.TosteJ. R. (2019). Data-based decision making for struggling readers in the secondary grades. Intervention in School and Clinic, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1053451219832991
8.
GilV.BennettK. D.BarbettaP. M. (2019). Teaching young adults with intellectual disability grocery shopping skills in a community setting using least-to-most prompting. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 649–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00340-x
9.
GilsonC. B.CarterE. W.BiggsE. E. (2017). Systematic review of instructional methods to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796917698831
10.
GoldenC. (2018). The data collection toolkit: Everything you need to organize, manage, and monitor classroom data. Brookes.
HooverA. (2016). The role of the community in transition to the adult world for students with disabilities. American Secondary Education, 44(2), 21–30.
13.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290507100203
JanuaryS. A. A.Van NormanE. R.ChristT. J.ArdoinS. P.EckertT. L.WhiteM. J. (2019). Evaluation of schedule frequency and density when monitoring progress with curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology, 34(1), 119. http://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000274
16.
JimenezB.MimsP. J.BrowderD. M. (2012). Data-based decisions guidelines for teachers of students with severe intellectual and developmental disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 407–413. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879634
17.
KeohaneD. D.GreerR. D. (2005). Teachers’ use of a verbally governed algorithm and student learning. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 1(3), 252–271. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0100749
18.
KonradM.KeeseyS.RessaV. A.AlexeeffM.ChanP. E.PetersM. T. (2014). Setting clear learning targets to guide instruction for all students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1053451214536042
19.
MandinachE. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
MazzottiV. L.PlotnerA. J. (2016). Implementing secondary transition evidence-based practices: A multi-state survey of transition service providers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143414544360
22.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
RoweD. A.AlversonC. Y.UnruhD. K.FowlerC. H.KellemsR.TestD. W. (2015). A Delphi study to operationalize evidence-based predictors in secondary transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143414526429
25.
ScheefA. R.JohnsonC. (2017). The power of the cloud: Google forms for transition assessment. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143417700844
26.
SitlingtonP. L.ClarkG. M. (2007). The transition assessment process and IDEIA 2004. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(3), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084070320030201
27.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
28.
TestD. W.MazzottiV.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0885728809346960
29.
TestD. W.SpoonerF.HolzbergD.RobertsonC.DavisL. L. (2017). Planning for other educational needs and community-based instruction. In WehmeyerM. A.ShogrenK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 130–150). Routledge.
30.
WalkerA. R.UpholdN. M.RichterS.TestD. W. (2010). Review of the literature on community-based instruction across grade levels. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 242–267. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879810