AlahmariA. (2019). A review and synthesis of the response to intervention (RtI)literature: Teachers implementations and perceptions. International Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 894–909. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-15-02
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
3.
BruhnA. L.RilaA.MahatmyaD. (2020). The effects of data-based, individualized interventions for behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1063426618806279
4.
CampbellS.CannonB.EllisJ. T.LifterK.LuiselliJ. K.NavaltaC. P.TarasM. (1998). The May Center for early childhood education: Description of a continuum of services model for children with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912980450204
5.
ConstableS.GrossiB.MonizA.RyanL. (2013). Meeting the common core state standards for students with autism: The challenges for educators. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(3), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500301
6.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Standards for evidence-based practices in special education.
7.
CroslandK.DunlapG. (2012). Effective strategies for the inclusion of children with autism in general education classrooms. Behavior Modification, 36(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512442682
FenskeE. C.ZalenskiS.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (1985). Age at intervention and treatment outcome for autistic children in a comprehensive intervention program. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5(1/2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80005-7
10.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R.DidionL. A.PengP.ClemensN. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918790001
11.
FleuryV. P. (2013). Task analysis (TA) fact sheet. University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders.
12.
FuchsD.FuchsL.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522966
13.
HammondR. K.CampbellJ. M.RubleL. A. (2013). Considering identification and service provision for students with autism spectrum disorders within the context of response to intervention. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 21(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.750119
14.
HarrowerJ.DunlapG. (2001). Including children with Autism in general education classrooms: A review of effective strategies. Behavior Modification, 25(5), 762–784. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0145445501255006
JungP.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
20.
LoiaconoV.ValentiV. (2010). General education teachers need to be prepared to co-teach the increasing number of children with Autism in inclusive settings. International Journal of Special Education, 25(3), 24–32.
21.
MaennerM. J.ShawK. A.BaioJ.WashingtonA.PatrickM.DiRienzoM.ChristensenD. L.WigginsL. D.PettygroveS.AndrewsJ. G.LopezM.HudsonA.BaroudT.SchwenkY.WhiteT.RosenbergC. R.LeeL.HarringtonR. A.HustonM.HewittA., et al. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years: Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. Surveillance Summaries, 69(4), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1
22.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.GilmourA. F. (2016). Intensive academic interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: An experimental framework. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616649162
23.
National Autism Center. (2009). National standards report: The national standards project: Addressing the need for evidence-based practice guidelines for autism spectrum disorders.
24.
National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 2.
NguyenN.BalsamoN.GarnettW. (2020). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorder with an emphasis on evidence-based practices: A comprehensive review of the literature from 2008-2020 [Manuscript in preparation].
30.
OdomS. E.BoydB. A.HallL. J.HumeK. (2010). Evaluation of comprehensive treatment models for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 40(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0825-1
31.
PowellS. R.SteckerP. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0040059914523735
32.
ReichowB.BartonE. E.BoydB. A.HumeK. (2014). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): A systematic review. Campbell Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2014.9
33.
SamA. M.CoxA. W.SavageM. N.WatersV.OdomS. L. (2020). Disseminating information on evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: AFIRM. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 50(6), 1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03945-x
34.
SamA. M.KucharczykS.WatersV. (2017). Online tools to support the delivery of evidence-based practices for students with ASD. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0040059917745654
35.
SimpsonR. L.de Boer-OttS. R.Smith-MylesB. (2003). Inclusion of learners with autism spectrum disorders in general education settings. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200304000-00005
36.
SolisM.El ZeinF.BlackM.MillerA.TherrienW. J.InvernizziM. (2018). Word study intervention for students with ASD: A multiple baseline study of data-based individualization. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(3), 287–298.
37.
StahmerA. C.RiethS.LeeE.ReisingerE. M.MandellD. S.ConnellJ. E. (2015). Training teachers to use evidence-based practices for autism: Examining procedural implementation fidelity. Psychology in the Schools, 52(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21815
38.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2020). 41st annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2019.
41.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.