AlfassiM. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.4.171-185
2.
AlfassiM.WeissI.LifshitzH. (2009). The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering the reading literacy of students with ID. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016854
3.
BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Alliance for Excellent Education.
4.
BoudreauD. (2002). Literacy skills in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 497–525. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016389317827
5.
BulgrenJ. A.GranerP. A.DeshlerD. D. (2013). Literacy challenges and opportunities for students with learning disabilities in social studies and history. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12003
6.
BurgoyneK.BaxterB.BuckleyS. (2014). Developing the reading skills of children with Down syndrome. In FaragherR.ClarkeB. (Eds.), Educating learners with Down syndrome: Research, theory, and practice with children and adolescents (pp. 195–215). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
7.
CoyneP.EvansM.KargerJ. (2017). Use of a UDL literacy environment by middle school students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.4
8.
Fautsch-PatridgeT.McMasterK. L.HuppS. C. (2011). Are current reading research findings applicable to students with intellectual disabilities? In SamuelsS. J.FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 215–265). International Reading Association.
9.
GatelyS. E. (2008). Facilitating reading comprehension for students on the autism spectrum. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(3), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000304
10.
GilbertF. (2018). Riding the reciprocal teaching bus: A teacher’s reflections on nurturing collaborative learning in a school culture obsessed by results. Changing English, 25(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1452606
HuaY.Woods-GroveS.FordJ. W.NoblesK.A. (2014). Effects of paraphrasing strategy on expository reading comprehension of young adults with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(3), 429–439.
13.
King-SearsM. E.Bowman-KruhmM. (2010). Attending to specialized reading instruction for adolescents with mild disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(4), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200404
14.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400et seq. (2004).
15.
International Reading Association. (2012). Adolescent literacy: A position statement of the International Reading Association (Rev. ed.).
16.
KlingerJ. K.VaughnS.BoardmanA. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
LundbergI.ReichenbergM. (2013). Developing reading comprehension among students with mild intellectual disabilities: An intervention study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.623179
19.
MarxT. A.HartJ. L.NelsonL.LoveJ.BaxterC. M.GartinB.Schaefer WhitbyP. J. (2014). Guiding IEP teams on meeting the least restrictive environment mandate. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214532345
20.
MeoG. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.21-30
21.
MeyerA.RoseD. H.GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST
22.
MorganM. F.MoniK. B.JoblingA. (2009). Who? Where? What? When? Why? How? Question words: What do they mean?British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00539.x
23.
MurnaneR.SawhillI.SnowC. (2012). Literacy challenges for the twenty-first century: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2012.0013
24.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council for Chief State School Officers (2010). English language arts standards: Reading: Informational text, Grade9–10. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RI/9-10/
25.
OczkusL. D. (2010). Reciprocal teaching at work: Powerful strategies and lessons for improving reading comprehension (2nd ed.). International Reading Association.
26.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
27.
ReichenbergM. (2014). The importance of structured text talks for students’ reading comprehension: An intervention study in special schools. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 15(3/4), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/JSER-2014-0012
28.
RobertsG.TorgesenJ. K.BoardmanA.ScammaccaN. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00264.x
29.
SlaterW. H.HorstmanF. R. (2002). Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: The case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure, 46(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880209604416
30.
van den BosK. P.NakkenH.NicolayP. G.van HoutenE. J. (2007). Adults with mild intellectual disabilities: Can their reading comprehension ability be improved?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 835–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00921.x
31.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
32.
WoodL.BrowderD.M.FlynnL. (2015). Teaching students with intellectual disability to use self-questioning strategy to comprehend social studies text for an inclusive setting. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915592155