Defining Educational Benefit: An Update on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017)

Aguilar J. (2018, February 12). Douglas County Schools must pay the private education costs of student who has autism, judge rules. Denver Post. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/02/12/douglas-county-schools-private-education-costs/

Aron L. (2005). Too much or not enough: How have the circuit courts denied a free appropriate education after Rowley? Suffolk University Law Review, 39, 1–26.

Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).

Conroy T. Yell M. L. (2019). Free appropriate public education after Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017). Touros Law Review, 35(1), 132–184.

Crockett J. B Yell M.L . (2008). Without data all we have are assumptions: Revisiting the meaning of a free appropriate public education. Journal of Law and Education, 37(3), 381–392.

Davidson L. (2016). Endrew F ex rel Joseph F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1: A missed opportunity. Denver Law Review Online, 94, 1–24.

Endrew F. v Douglas County School District , 290 F. Supp. 3d 1175 (D. Colo. 2018).

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1, 798, F.3d 1329 (10th Cir. 2015), vacated and remanded, 137 S.Ct. 988, 580 U.S. ____ (2017).

Goldschmidt S. (2011). A new IDEA for special education law: Resolving the “appropriate” educational benefit circuit split and ensuring a meaningful education for students with disabilities. Catholic University Law Review, 60(3), 749–804.

H.R. Rep. No. 94-332 (1975).

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2006 & Supp. V. 2011).

Johnson S. F. (2012). Rowley forever more? A call for clarity and change. Journal of Law and Education, 41(1), 25–48.

Petition for a writ of certiorari. (2017). http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/15-827-Petition-for-Certiorari.pdf

Rowley v. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson School District, 483 F. Supp. 528 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), 632 F.2d 945 (2nd Cir. 1982).

Seligmann T. J. (2017). Flags on the play: The Supreme Court takes the field to enforce the rights of students with disabilities. Journal of Law and Education, 46(4), 470–498.

S. Rep. No. 94-168 (1975).

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2017). Questions and answers (Q&A) on U. S. Supreme Court Case Decision Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/qa-endrewcase-12-07-2017.pdf

U.S. Solicitor General. (2016). Brief for the United States as amicus curiae to U.S. Supreme Court in Endrew F. v. Douglas City Schools. http://wwwscotusblog.com/case-files/cases/endrew-f-v-douglas-county-schooldistrict/

Waterstone J. (2017). Endrew F.: Symbolism v. reality. Journal of Law and Education, 46(4), 527–538.

Wenkart R. D. (2009). The Rowley standard: A circuit by circuit review of how Rowley has been interpreted. Education Law Reporter, 247, 1–24.

Yell M. L. Bateman D. F. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017): FAPE and the U.S. Supreme Court. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917721116

Zirkel P. A. (2019). The aftermath of Endrew F.: An outcome analysis eighteen months later. West’s Education Law Reporter, 361, 488–497.