AbdollahzadehE.AmiriN. (2009). The effect of semantic mapping as a vocabulary instruction technique on EFL learners with different perceptual learning styles. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.198
BeachK. D.SanchezV.FlynnL.O’ConnorR. E. (2015). Teaching academic vocabulary to adolescents with learning disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594783
4.
BeckI.McKeownM.KucanL. (2013). Bringing word to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
5.
BintzW.P. (2011). Teaching vocabulary across the curriculum. Middle School Journal, 42(4), 45–53.
6.
BosC.AndersP. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461773
CarnahanC. R.WilliamsonP. S.HollingsheadA.IsraelM. (2012). Using technology to support balanced literacy for students with significant disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500104
9.
CookS. C.RaoK. (2018). Systematically applying UDL to effective practices for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717749936
10.
DaltonB.GrishamD. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 ways to use technology to build vocabulary. Reading Teacher, 64(5), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.1
11.
FrayerD.FrederickW. C.KlausmeierH. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of cognitive mastery. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
12.
GerstenR. F.FuchsL.WilliamsJ. P. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
13.
GreenwoodS. C. (2010) Content area readers: Helping middle-level students become word aware (and enjoy it!). Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(6), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505423
14.
HallT. E.CohenN.VueG.GanleyP. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375
15.
HowardN. R.HowardK. E. (2017). Using tablet technologies to engage and motivate urban high school students. International Journal of Educational Technology, 4(42), 66–74.
16.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE 2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
17.
KennedyM. J.DeshlerD. D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300406
18.
KennedyM. J.ThomasC. N.MeyerJ. P.AlvesK. D.LloydJ. W. (2014). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/0.1177/0731948713507262
19.
MeoG. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.21-30
20.
MeyerA.RoseD. H.GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Vocabulary results from the 2009 and 2011 NAEP reading assessments (NCES 2013-452). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2013452.pdf
22.
PalmerJ.BoonR. T.SpencerV. G. (2014). Effects of concept mapping instruction on the vocabulary acquisition skills of seventh-graders with mild disabilities: A replication study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10/1080/10573569.2013.818890
23.
PetersC. (1974). A comparison between the Frayer model concept of attainment and the textbook approach to concept attainment. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(2), 252–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/747186
24.
RaoK.BerquistE. (2017). A co-teaching conversation: Using universal design for learning (UDL) to plan lessons together for the inclusive classroom. In BerquistE. (Ed.), UDL: Moving from exploration to integration (pp.122–138). CAST Professional Publishing.
RekrutM. D. (1996). Effective vocabulary instruction. High School Journal, 80(1), 66.
27.
RupleyW. H.NicholsW. D.MrazM.BlairT. R. (2012). Building conceptual understanding through vocabulary instruction. Reading Horizons, 51(4), 299–321.
28.
SchreiberJ. (2017). Universal design for learning: A student-centered curriculum perspective. Curriculum and Teaching, 32(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/32.2.06
29.
SwansonE.VaughnS.WexlerJ. (2017). Enhancing adolescents’ comprehension of text by building vocabulary knowledge. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917720777
30.
TaylorD. B.MrazM.NicholsW. D.RickelmanR. J.WoodK. D. (2009). Using explicit instruction to promote vocabulary learning for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683663
31.
WanjiruB.O-ConnorM. (2015). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on students’ achievement in mathematics in secondary schools of Murang’a County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 201–207.