BlairD. V. (2009). Learner agency: To understand and to be understood. British Journal of Music Education, 26, 173–187. doi:10.1017/S0265051709008420
2.
BlumbergP. (2014). Assessing and improving your teaching: Strategies and rubrics for faculty growth and student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BlumbergP. (2015). How critical reflection benefits faculty as they implement learner-centered teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 144, 87–97 doi:10.1002/tl.20165
4.
BoulosJ. M. (2015). Peer assisted learning strategies for reading skills improvement by children with social, emotional and behavioral disorders (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Accession No. 3738531)
5.
BrooksB.HuckA.JellisonJ. (1984). Structuring small groups and music reinforcement to facilitate positive interactions and acceptance of severely handicapped students in the regular music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 13, 243–264. doi:10.2307/3344923
6.
BrownL.DraperE.JellisonJ. (2017). Learning together: The instinct to do good and peer-assisted strategies that work. Music Educators Journal, 104(2), 15–20. doi:10.1177/0027432117713823
7.
BrownL.JellisonJ. (2012). Music research with children and youth with disabilities and typically developing peers: A systematic review. Journal of Music Therapy, 49, 335–364. doi:10.1177/1048371314565456
8.
DarrowA.GibbsP.WedelS. (2005). Use of classwide peer tutoring in the general music classroom. Applications of Research in Music Education, 24, 15–26. doi:10.1177/87551233050240010103
9.
DraperE. (2017). Observations of children with disabilities in four elementary music classrooms. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36, 12–19. doi:10.1177/87551233
10.
DraperE. A.JellisonJ. A. (2015). Music research in inclusive school settings: 1975–2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 325–331. doi:10.1177/0022429414554808
11.
FantuzzoJ. WGinsburg-BlockM. D.MillerT. R.RohrbeckC. A. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257. doi:10.1037/00220663952240
12.
FantuzzoJ. W.Ginsburg-BlockM. D.RohrbeckC. A. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749. doi:10.1037/00220663984732
13.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 174–206. doi:10.3102/00028312034001174
14.
GraffC.ThoriusK. (2018). Extending peer-assisted learning strategies for racially, linguistically, and ability diverse learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53, 163–170. doi:10.1177/1053451217702113
15.
HammelA.HouriganR. (2017). Teaching music to students with special needs: A label-free approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
JellisonJ. (2002). On-task participation of typical students close to and far away from classmates with disabilities in an elementary music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 343–355.
17.
JellisonJ. (2015). Including everyone: Creating music classrooms where all children can learn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
JohnsonE. (2017). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted learning structures on music achievement and learner engagement in seventh-grade band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65, 163–178. doi:10.1177/0022429417712486
19.
RaelinJ. A.2010. Work-based learning: Valuing practice as an educational event. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 123, 39–46. doi:10.1002/tl.419
20.
ToppingK. (2008). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Newton, MA: Brookline Books.