AdesopeO. O.TrevisianD. A.Sundararajan. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta- analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87, 659–701. doi:10.3102/0034654316689306
2.
Bangert–DrownsR. L.KulikJ. A.KulikC. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 89–99. doi:10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818
3.
BrownP. C.RoedigerH. L.IIIMcDanielM. A. (2014). Make it stick. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
4.
CollinsL. W.CookL. (2016). Never say never: The appropriate and inappropriate use of praise and feedback for students with learning and behavioral disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 29, 153–173. doi:10.1108/S0735-004X20160000029007
KarpickeJ.D.RoedigerH.L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966–968.
9.
LandauerT. K.BjorkR. A. (1978) Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. et al. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
10.
LubinJ.PollowayE. A. (2016). Mnemonic instruction in science and social studies for students with learning problems: A review. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14, 207–224.
11.
McDanielM. A.RoedigerH. L.McDermottK. B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200–206. doi:10.3758/BF03194052
12.
PashlerH.RohrerD.CepedaN. J.CarpenterS. K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 187–193. doi:10.3758/BF03194050
13.
PycM. A.RawsonK. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
14.
RoedigerH. L.IIIButlerA. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
15.
RoedigerH. L.IIIKarpickeJ. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745–6916.2006.00012.x
16.
RoedigerH. L.IIIPutnamA. L.SmithM. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 1–36. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00001-6
17.
SchnorrC. I.Freeman-GreenS.TestD. W. (2016). Response cards as a strategy for increasing opportunities to respond: An examination of the evidence. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 41–54. doi:10.1177/0741932515575614
18.
ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ. E.MastropieriM. A. (2005). Cognition and learning in inclusive high school chemistry classes. In ScruggsT. E.MastropiereM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 18. Cognition and learning in diverse settings (pp. 99–110). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. doi:10.1016/S0735-004X(05)18005-7
19.
SonL. K.KornellN. (2008). Research on the allocation of study time: Key studies from 1890 to the present (and beyond). In DunloskyJ.BjorkR. A., (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 333–351). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
20.
SumowskiJ. F.ChiaravallotiN.DeLucaJ. (2010). Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: Clinical application of the testing effect. Neuropsychology, 24, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017533
21.
SumowskiJ. F.CoyneJ.CohenA.DeLucaJ. (2014). Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 397–400. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.021
22.
ToffaliniE.GiofrèD.CornoldiC. (2017). Strengths and weaknesses in the intellectual profile of different subtypes of specific learning disorder: A study on 1,049 diagnosed children. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 402–409. doi:10.1177/2167702616672038
23.
WexlerJ.ReedD. K.PyleN.MitchellM.BartonE. E. (2015). A synthesis of peer-mediated academic interventions for secondary struggling learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 451–470. doi:10.1177/0022219413504997