AndzikN. R.Cannella-MaloneH. I.SigafoosJ. (2016). Practitioner-implemented functional communication training: A review of the literature. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41, 79–89. doi:10.1177/1540796916633874
2.
AxelrodM. J.ZankA. J. (2012). Increasing classroom compliance: Using a high-probability command sequence with noncompliant students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 119–133. doi:11.1007/s10864-011-9145-6
3.
CarrE. G.DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing problem behaviors through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111
4.
ChiangH. M. (2008). Expressive communication of children with autism: The use of challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 966–972.
5.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
6.
DucharmeJ. M.WorlingD. E. (1994). Behavioral momentum and stimulus fading in the acquisition and maintenance of child compliance in the home. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 639–647. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-639
EschK.FrylingM. J. (2013). A comparison of two variations of the high-probability instructional sequence with a child with autism. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 61–72.
9.
FrostL.BondyA. (2002). Picture Exchange Communication System training manual (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: Pyramid Education Products.
10.
HoulihanD.JacobsonL.BrandonP. K. (1994). Replication of a high-probability request sequence with varied interprompt times in a preschool setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 737–738. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-737
11.
JungS.SainatoD. M.DavisC. A. (2008). Using high-probability request sequences to increase social interactions in young children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 163–187. doi:10.1177/1053815108317970
12.
LipschultzJ. L.WilderD. A. (2017). Recent research on the high-probability instructional sequence: A brief review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 424–428. doi:10.1002/jaba.378
13.
MaceF. C.HockM. L.LalliJ. S.WestB. J.BelfioreP.PinterE.BrownD. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141. Doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-507
14.
MajdalanyL. M.WilderD. A.AllgoodJ.SturkieL. (2017). Evaluation of a preliminary method to examine antecedent and consequent contributions to noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 146–158. doi:10.1002/jaba.353
15.
McComasJ. J.ThompsonA.JohnsonL. (2003). The effects of presession attention of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 297–307. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-297
16.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17.
O’ReillyM.ChaturiE.SigafoosJ.LancioniG.MachalicekW.MassimoA. (2007). The effects of presession attention on subsequent attention-extinction and alone conditions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 731–735. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.731-735
18.
RadleyK. C.DartE. H. (2016). Antecedent strategies to promote children’s and adolescents’ compliance with adult requests: A review of the literature. Clinical and Child Family Psychology Review, 19, 39–54. doi:10.1007/s10567-015-0197-3
19.
RoantreeC. F.KennedyC. H. (2006). A paradoxical effect of presession attention on stereotypy: Antecedent attention as an establishing, not an abolishing operation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 381–384. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.97-05
20.
SimacekJ.DimianA. F.McComasJ. J. (2017). Communication intervention for young children with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities via telehealth. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 744–767. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-3006-z
21.
SingerG. H. S.SingerJ.HornerR. H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 12, 287–291. doi:10.1177/154079698701200405
22.
WilderD. A.MajdalanyL.SturkieL.SmeltzL. (2015). Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 511–522. doi:10.1002/jaba.218
23.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.. . .SchultzT. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.