AultM. J.WoleryM.GastD. L.DoyleP. M.EizenstatV. (1988). Comparison of response prompting procedures in teaching numeral identification to autistic subjects. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 627–636. doi:10.1007/BF02211880
2.
BrittonN. S.CollinsB. C.AultM. J.BauschM. E. (2017). Using a constant time delay procedure to teach support personnel to use a simultaneous prompting procedure. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 102–113. doi:10.1177/1088357615587505
3.
CampbellM. L.MechlingL. C. (2009). Small group computer-assisted instruction with SMART board technology: An investigation of observational and incidental learning of nontarget information. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 47–57. doi:10.1177/0741932508315048
4.
CollinsB. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
5.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.GallowayC. G.KarlA.MillerA. (2007). A comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233.
6.
CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.GallowayC. C. (2011). The addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 22–39.
7.
CollinsB. C.TerrellM.TestD. W. (2017). Using a simultaneous prompting procedure to embed core content when teaching a potential employment skill. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 36–44. doi:10.1177/2165143416680347
8.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall.
9.
Creech-GallowayC.CollinsB. C.KnightV.BauschM. E. (2014). Using simultaneous prompting with an iPad to teach the Pythagorean theorem to adolescents with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities, 38, 222–232. doi:10.1177/154079691303800402
10.
DemchakM. (1989). A comparison of graduated guidance and increasing assistance in teaching adults with severe handicaps leisure skills. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 45–55.
11.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A systematic review of procedural parameters. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 28–40. doi:10.1177/154079698801300104
12.
FalkenstineK. J.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertK. (2009). Presenting chained and discrete tasks as nontargeted information when teaching discrete academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127–142.
13.
FetkoE. E.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.SchusterJ. W.SpriggsA. (2013). Using peer tutors and a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach a leisure skill to students with disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 400–411.
14.
GodseyJ. R.SchusterJ. W.LingoA. S.CollinsB. C.KleinertH. L. (2008). Peer-implemented time delay procedures on the acquisition of chained tasks by students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 111–122.
15.
HeinrichS.CollinsB. C.KnightV.SpriggsA. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 41–54.
16.
HudsonT. H.Hinkson-LeeK.CollinsB. C. (2013). Teaching paragraph composition to student with emotional/behavioral disorders using the simultaneous prompting procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 139–156. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9167-8
17.
KarlJ.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J. (2013). Teaching core content embedded in a functional activity to students with moderate cognitive disabilities using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 363–378.
18.
LaneJ. D.GastD. L.LedfordJ. R.ShepleyC. (2017). Increasing social behaviors in young children with social-communication delays in a group arrangement in preschool. Education & Treatment of Children, 40, 115–144. doi:10.1353/etc.2017.0007
19.
ManleyK.CollinsB. C.StenhoffD. M.KleinertH. (2008). Using a system of least prompts procedure to teach telephone skills to elementary students with cognitive disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 221–236. doi:10.1007/s10864-008-9065-2
20.
MorseT. E.SchusterJ. W. (2004). Simultaneous prompting: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 153–168.
21.
PenningtonR.CollinsB. C.StenhoffD. M.TurnerK.GunselmanK. (2014). Using simultaneous prompting to teach generative writing to students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 396–414.
22.
RiggsL.CollinsB. C.KleinertH.KnightV. (2013). Teaching principles of heredity to high school students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities, 38, 30–43. doi:10.2511/027494813807046971
23.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
24.
Tekin-IftarE.CollinsB. C.SpoonerF.Olcay-GulS. (2017). Teaching teachers to use systematic instruction to teach core content to students with ASD. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 225–245. doi:10.1177/0888406417703751
25.
WalkerG. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 261–275. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4
26.
WertsM. G.WoleryM.HolcombeA.GastD. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75. doi:10.1007/BF02110214
27.
WhaleyD. L.SurrattS. L. (1968). Attitudes of science. Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.
28.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York, NY: Longman.
29.
WoleryM.SchusterJ. W. (1997). Instructional methods for students who have significant disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 61–79. doi:10.1177/002246699703100106
30.
WoleryT. D.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C. (2000). Effects of future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77–94. doi:10.1023/A:1016679928480