Strategies for Minimizing Variability in Progress Monitoring of Oral Reading Fluency

Alonzo J. Tindal G. Ulmer K. Glasgow A. (2006). easyCBM® online progress monitoring assessment system. Eugene: University of Oregon, Behavioral Research and Teaching.

Ardoin S. P. Christ T. J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Standard errors associated with progress monitoring outcomes from DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an experimental passage set. School Psychology Review, 38, 266–283.

Ardoin S. P. Christ T. J. Morena L. S. Cormier D. C. Klingbeil D. A. (2013). A systemic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.004

Betts J. Pickart M. Heistad D. (2009). An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating for alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.001

Briggs R. N. (2011). Investigating variability in student performance on DIBELS oral reading fluency third grade progress monitoring probes: Possible contributing factors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (UMI No. 3466319)

Christ T. J. Ardoin S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55–75. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.004

Christ T. J. , & Colleagues. (2015). Formative Assessment System for Teachers: Abbreviated technical manual, Version 2.0. Minneapolis, MN: Author and FastBridge Learning.

Christ T.J. Silberglitt B. (2007). Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum-based measures of oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 130–146.

Christ T. J. Zopluoglu C. Monaghen B. D. Van Norman E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 19–57. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.11.001

Cummings K. D. Park Y. Schaper H. A. B. (2013). Form effects on DIBELS Next oral reading fluency progress-monitoring passages. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 91–104. doi:10.1177/1534508412447010

Deno S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232. doi:10.1177/001440298505200303

Deno S. L. Fuchs L. S. Marston D. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507–524.

Deno S. L. Marston D. Shinn M. Tindal G. (1983). Oral reading fluency: A simple datum for scaling reading disability. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(4), 53–59.

Derr-Minneci T. F. Shapiro E. S. (1992). Validating curriculum-based measurement in reading from a behavioral perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 2–16.

Dynamic Measurement Group. (2012). Progress monitoring with DIBELS Next^®. Eugene, OR: Author.

Francis D. J. Santi K. L. Barr C. Fletcher J. M. Varisco A. Foorman B. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315–342. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003

Fuchs L. S. Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement and student awareness of learning. American Education Research Journal, 21, 449–460. doi:10.2307/1162454

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. Stecker P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Education Research Journal, 28, 617–641. doi:10.3102/00028312028003617

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hosp M. K. Jenkins J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Maxwell L. (1988). The validity of informal measures of reading comprehension. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20–28. doi:10.1177/074193258800900206

Good R. H. III Kaminski R. A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.

Good R. H. III Kaminski R. A. Cummings K. Dufour-Martel C. Petersen K. . . . Wallin J. (2011). DIBELS Next assessment manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.

Hintze J. M. Christ T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204–217.

Hosp M. K. Hosp J. L. Howell K. W. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kim Y. Petscher Y. Schatschneider C. Foorman B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 652–667.

Kovaleski J. F. VanDerHeyden A. M. Shapiro E. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Nelson P. M. Van Norman E. R. Christ T. J. (2017). Visual analysis among novices: Training and trend lines as graphic aids. Contemporary School Psychology, 21, 93–102. doi:10.1007/s40688-016-0107-9

O’Keeffe B. V. Bundock K. Kladis K. L. Yan R. Nelson K. (2017). Variability in DIBELS Next progress monitoring measures for students at risk for reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 272–283. doi:10.1177/0741932517713310

Ottenbacher K. J. (1990). Visual inspection of single-subject data: An empirical analysis. Mental Retardation, 28, 283–290.

Pearson. (2017). AimswebPlus progress monitoring guide. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.

Poncy B. C. Skinner C. H. Axtell P. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 226–238. doi:10.1177/073428290502300403

Powell-Smith K. A. Good R. H. Atkins T. (2010). DIBELS Next oral reading fluency readability study (Tech. Rep. No. 7). Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.

Reed D. K. Sturges K. M. (2012). An examination of assessment fidelity in the administration and interpretation of reading tests. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 259–268. doi:10.1177/0741932512464580

Shapiro E. S. (2012). Commentary on progress monitoring with CBM-R and decision making: Problems found and looking for solutions. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.11.003

Shinn M. M. Shinn M. R. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. New York, NY: Pearson.

Shinn M. R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601–617.

Tindal G. Nese J. F. T. Stevens J. J. Alonso J. (2016). Growth on oral reading fluency measures as a function of special education and measurement sufficiency. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 28–40. doi:10.1177/0741932515590234

Van Norman E. R. Christ T. J . (2016). How accurate are interpretations of curriculum-based measurement progress monitoring data? Visual analysis versus decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.003

Van Norman E. R. Nelson P. M. Shin J. Christ T. J . (2013). An evaluation of the effects of graphic aids in improving decision accuracy in a continuous treatment design. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 283–301. doi:10.1007/s10864-013-9176-2

Wayman M. M. Wallace T. Wiley H. I. Tichá R. Espin C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401