BlantonM.LeviL.CritesT.DoughertyB. J. (2011). Developing essential understandings of ratios, proportions and proportional reasoning: Grades 6–8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
2.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.PorterfieldJ.FalcomataT.ShihM.ValentineC.. . . BellK. (2014). The effects of a tier 3 intervention for second grade students with serious mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 176–188. doi:10.1177/0022219414538516.
3.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.HughesK.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23. doi:10.1177/001440291107800101
4.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K.FienH.CaryM. S. (2016). Examining the efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 152–165. doi:10.1177/0022219414538514
5.
Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2013). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Institute for Mathematics and Education.
6.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.FienH.BakerS. K.KostyD. B.CaryM. S. (2015). The science behind curriculum development and evaluation: Taking a design science approach in the production of Tier 2 mathematics curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 97–111. doi:10.1177/0731948713520555
7.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173. doi:10.1177/001440290807400202
8.
MazzoccoM. M. M.DevlinK. T. (2008). Parts and holes: Gaps in rational number sense in children with vs. without mathematical learning disability. Developmental Science, 11(5), 681–691. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00717.x
9.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). NAEP 2015 mathematics: Report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
10.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education.
11.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
12.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 381–394. doi:10.1037/a0018447
14.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC. S.RobertsG. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.