Promising Practices for Supporting Students with Disabilities through Writing in Science

Archer A. L. Hughes C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Aydeniz M. Cihak D. F. Graham S. C. Retinger L. (2012). Using inquiry-based science instruction for teaching science to students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 189–206.

Baker W. P. Barstack R. Clark D. Hull E. Goodman B. Kook J. Lang M. (2008). Writing-to-learn in the inquiry-science classroom: Effective strategies from middle school science and writing teachers. Clearing House, 81, 105–108. doi:10.3200/tchs.81.3.105-108

Choi A. Notebaert A. Diaz J. Hand B. (2010). Examining arguments generated by Year 5, 7, and 10 students in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 40, 149–169. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9105-x

Colburn A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education’s “grand unifying theory.” Clearing House, 74, 9–12. doi:10.1080/00098655.2000.11478630

Cook B. G. Tankersley M. Cook L. Landrum T. J. (2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 69–75. doi:10.1177/1053451214532071

Every Student Succeeds Act, U.S.C. §1177 et seq. (2015).

Fisher D. Frey N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Fulton L. Campbell B. (2014). Science notebooks: Writing about inquiry (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Furtak E. M. Siedel T. Iverson H. Briggs D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82, 300–329. doi:10.3102/0034654312457206

Gersten R. Baker S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 251–272. doi:10.1086/499668

Gillespie A. Graham S. (2015). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80, 454–473. doi:10.1177/001402914527238

Graham S. Harris K. R. Mason L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001

Graham S. McKeown D. Kiuhara S. Harris K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185

Harn B. Parisi D. Stoolmiller M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79, 181–193. doi:10.1177/001440291307900204

Harris K. Graham S. Mason L. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340. doi:10.3102/00028312043002295

Harris K. R. Graham S. Mason L. H. Saddler B. (2002). Developing self-regulated writers. Theory Into Practice, 41, 110–115. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_7

Hattie J. Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.

Kaldenberg E. Therrien W. Watt S. Gorsh J. Taylor J. (2011). Three keys to success in Science for students with learning disabilities. Science Scope, 35, 36–39.

Klentschy M. P. Molina-De La Torre E. (2004). Students’ science notebooks and the inquiry process. In Saul E. W. (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 340–354). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.

Landrum T. J. Tankersley M. Kauffman J. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 148–156. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030401

Lee O. Mahotiere M. Salinas A. Penfield R. D. Maerten-Rivera J. (2009). Science writing achievement among English language learners: Results of three-year intervention in urban elementary schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 32, 153–167. doi:10.1080/15235880903170009

Lewis T. J. Hudson S. Richter M. Johnson N. (2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 247–259.

Martin-Hansen L. (2002). Defining inquiry. NSTA WebNews Digest: The Science Teacher. Featured. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=46515

Meltzer L. (2010). Promoting executive function in the classroom. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National assessment of educational progress: Science assessment. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (2004). NSTA position statement: Scientific inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/inquiry.aspx.

Pearson P. D. Moje E. Greenleaf C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328, 459–463. doi:10.1126/science.118 2595

Project Write. (2009). TREE support materials. Retrieved from http://kc.vanderbilt.edu/projectwrite/tree-support.html

Ruiz-Primo M. A. Li M. Tsai S. P. Schneider J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 583–608. doi:10.1002/tea.20356

Santangelo T. Harris K. R. Graham S. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to support students who have “trubol giting thangs into werds.” Remedial and Special Education, 29, 78–89. doi:10.1177/0741932507311636

Scruggs T. E. Mastropieri M. A. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163–173. doi:10.1023/A:1016640214368

Scruggs T. E. Mastropieri M. A. Berkeley S. L. Marshak L. (2010). Mnemonic strategies: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 79–86. doi:10.1177/1053451210374985

Scruggs T. E. Mastropieri M. A. Okolo C. M. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–24.

Swanson H. L. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In Gersten R. M. Schiller E. P. Vaughn S. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. The LEA series on special education and disability (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Torres C. Farley C. A. Cook B. G. (2012). A special educator’s guide to successfully implementing evidence-based practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45, 64–73. doi:10.1177/004005991204500109

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). 36th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2014. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2014/parts-b-c/36th-idea-arc.pdf