BoulineauT.ForeC.Hagan-BurkeS.BurkeM.D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105–121.
2.
BulgrenJ. A.GranerP. S.DeshlerD. D. (2013). Literacy challenges and opportunities for students with learning disabilities in social studies and history. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 28, 17–27.
3.
ChangK.SungY.ChenI. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 5–23.
4.
DexterD. D.HughesC. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34, 51–72.
5.
DiCeccoV. M.GleasonM. M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306–320.
6.
DyeG. A. (2000). GO to the rescue! Helping students link—and remember—information. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 32(3), 72–76.
EllisE.HowardP. (2007). Graphic organizers: Power tools for teaching students with learning disabilities. Current Practice Alerts, 13, 1–4.
9.
GajriaM.JitendraA. K.SoodS.SacksG. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 210–225.
HughesC. A.MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2003). Interventions that positively impact the performances of students with learning disabilities in secondary general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities, 12, 101–111.
KangS. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. English Language Teachers Journal, 58, 58–66.
14.
KimA.VaughnS.WanzekJ.WeiS. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.
15.
ManoliP.PapadopoulouM. (2012). Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: Research findings and issues. Creative Education, 3, 348–356.
16.
McLaughlinM.OverturfB. J. (2012). The common core: Insight into the K–5 standards. Reading Teacher, 66, 153–164. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01115
17.
MoschovakiE.MeadowsS. (2005). Young children’s cognitive engagement during classroom book reading: Differences according to book, text genre, and story format. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 7(2). Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v7n2/moschovaki.html
18.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
NeufeldP. (2005). Comprehension instruction in content area classes. Reading Teacher, 59, 302–312.
20.
ShmaefskyB. R. (2007). E-concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(4), 14–15.
21.
SwansonH. L.DeshlerD. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 124–135.
22.
VaughnS.EdmondsM. (2006). Reading comprehension for older readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 131–137.
23.
VaughnS. R.BosC. S.SchummJ. S. (2011). Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk in the general education classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
24.
WilliamsJ. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on test structure. Journal of Special Education, 39, 6–18.