BrowderD. M.TrelaK.CourtadeG. R.JimenezB. A.KnightV.FlowersC. (2012). Teaching mathematics and science to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 46, 26–35.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233.
4.
CollinsB. C.HagerK. L.GallowayC. C. (2011). Addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 22–39.
Cuenca-CarlinoY.MustianA. L. (2013). Self-regulated strategy development: Connecting persuasive writing to self-advocacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 3–15.
7.
DunnC. (1996). A status report on transition planning for individuals with learning disabilities.In PattonJ.R.BlaylockG. (Eds.) Transition and students with learning disabilities: Facilitating the movement from school to adult life. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
8.
FalkenstineK. J.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertH. (2009). Presenting chained and discrete tasks as non-targeted information when teaching discrete academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127–142.
9.
HessK. K. (2012). Learning progressions in K–8 classrooms: How progress maps can influence classroom practice and perceptions and help teachers make more informed instructional decisions in support of struggling learners (Synthesis Report No. 87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
10.
KonradM.TestD. W. (2007). Effects of GO 4 IT . . . NOW! strategy instruction on the written IEP goal articulation and paragraph-writing skills of middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 277–291.
11.
KonradM.TrelaK.TestD. W. (2006). Using IEP goals and objectives to teach paragraph writing to high school students with physical and cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 111–124.
NewmanL.WagnerM.HuangT.ShaverD.KnokeyA. M.YuJ.ContrerasE.FergusonK.GreeneS.NagleK.CametoR. (2011). Secondary School Programs and Performance of Students With Disabilities. A Special Topic Report of Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2)(NCSER 2012-3000). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC:National Center for Special Education Research.
15.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
16.
NoletV.McLaughlinM. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17.
SteinbeckJ. (1937). Of mice and men. New York, NY:Covici Friede.
18.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.