BaroodyA. J. (1983). The case of Adam: A specific evaluation of a math learning disability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED229146)
CarpenterT. P.FrankeM. L.JacobsV. R.FennemaE.EmpsonS. B. (1997). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children’s multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749715
4.
CrawfordL.TindalG.StieberS. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student achievement on statewide assessment tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0704_04
5.
DenoS. L. (1985) Curriculum based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
6.
FuchsL. S. (2005). Prevention research in mathematics: Improving outcomes, building identification models, and understanding disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 350–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380041201
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–23.
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamletC. L.SteckerP. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Education Research Journal, 28, 617–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003617
9.
HesslerT.KonradM. (2008). Using curriculum based measures to drive IEPs and instruction in written expression. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41(2), 28–37.
10.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq. (2006).
11.
KamiiC.KirklandL.LewisB. A. (2001). Representation and abstraction in young children’s numerical reasoning. In CuocoA. A.CurcioF. (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 24–34). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12.
KoellnerK.ColsmanM.RisleyR. (2009). Another approach to progress monitoring. Paper presented at Courage to Risk, Colorado Springs, CO.
13.
LamonS. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 41–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749385
14.
LamonS. J. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children’s partitioning strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 170–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749599
15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
16.
PothierY.SawadaD. (1983). Partitioning: The emergence of rational number ideas in young children. Journal for Research in MathematicsEducation, 14, 307–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748675
17.
RichardsonK. (2003). Assessing math concepts. Bellingham, WA: Mathematical Perspectives.
18.
US Math Recovery Council. (2006). Add+VantageMR: Informed assessment for math teaching. Nashville, TN: Author.
19.
WoodwardJ.HowardL. (1994). The misconceptions of youth: Errors and their mathematical meaning. Exceptional Children, 61, 126–136.
20.
WrightR. J.MartlandJ.StaffordA. K.StangerG. (2004). Teaching number: Advancing children’s skills and strategies. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
21.
YsseldykeJ.BettsJ.ThillT.HanniganE. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to improve mathematics skills for students in Title I programs. Preventing School Failure, 48(4), 10–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.48.4.10-14