AlbertoP. A.TaberT. A.FredrickL. D. (1999). Use of self-operated auditory prompts to decrease aberrant behaviors in students with moderate mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 429–439.
2.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.BartlettW.WengP. (2012). Promoting independence through assistive technology: Evaluating audio recorders to support grocery shopping. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 462–474.
3.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.MuhlA.BartlettW. (2013). Using audio recorders to promote independence in grocery shopping for students with intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(4), 15–26.
4.
CihakD.AlbertoP. A.FredrickL. D. (2007). Use of brief functional analysis and intervention evaluation in public settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 80–93.
5.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
6.
HughesM. A.AlbertoP. A.FredrickL. D. (2006). Self-operated auditory prompting systems as a function-based intervention in public community settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 230–243.
7.
MaysN. M.HeflinL. J. (2011). Increasing independence in self-care tasks for children with autism using self-operated auditory prompts. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1351–1357.
8.
MechlingL. C. (2007). Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks: A literature review. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 252–269.
9.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.SeidN. H. (2010). Evaluation of a personal digital assistant as a self-prompting device for increasing multi-step task completion by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 422–439.
10.
MontgomeryJ.StoreyK.PostM.LemleyJ. (2011). The use of auditory prompting systems for increasing independent performance of students with autism in employment training. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 34, 330–335.
11.
PostM.MontgomeryJ.StoreyK. (2009). A decision tree for the use of auditory prompting strategies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31, 51–54.
12.
Taber-DoughtyT. (2005). Considering student choice when selectinginstructional strategies: A comparison of three prompting systems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 411–432.
13.
Taber-DoughtyT.PattonS. E.BrennanS. (2008). Simultaneous and delayed video modeling: An examination of system effectiveness and student preferences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 1–18.
14.
WattsE. H.O’BrianM.WojcikB. W. (2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration: How do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices?Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 43–56.