Helping Students With Disabilities Comprehend Text in Online Coursework

Ballas F. A. Belyk D. (2000). Student achievement and performance levels in online education research study. Red Deer, Canada: Schollie Research & Consulting. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20051031044348/http://www.ataoc.ca/files/pdf/AOCresearch_full_report.pdf.

Beers K. (2002). When kids can’t read: What teachers can do: A guide for teachers 6–12. New York, NY: Heinemann.

Biuk-Aghai R. P. (2006, October). Visualizing co-authorship networks in online Wikipedia. In Communications and information technologies, 2006. ISCIT’06 International Symposium (pp. 737–742). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Coiro J. (2006). Exploring changes to reading comprehension on the Internet: Paradoxes and possibilities for diverse adolescent readers. Unpublished dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Coiro J. Dobler E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.

Cunningham A. Stanovich K. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22(1–2), 8–15.

De Ridder I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process. Language Learning & Technology, 6, 123–146.

Devitt A. J. (2007). Transferability and genres. In Keller C.J. Weisser C.R. (Eds.) The locations of composition (pp. 215–27) Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Gersten R. Fuchs L. F. Williams J. P. Baker S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.

Hartman D. K. (2000). What will be the influences of media on literacy in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 280–282.

Kaakinen J. K. Hyönä J. Keenan J. M. (2002). Perspective effects on online text processing. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 159–173.

Klein C. (2006). Virtual charter school and home schooling. Youngston, NY: Cambria Press.

LaBerge D. Samuels S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

Lipka O. Lesaux N. K. Siegel L. S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of grade 4 students with reading disabilities risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 364–378.

Norman R. (2012). Reading the graphics: What is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 25, 739–774.

Rapp K. E. Eckes S. E. Plurker J. A. (2006). Cyber schools in Indiana: Policy implications for the current statutory language. Education Policy Brief, (4)3. Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu/projects/PDF/PB_V4N3_Winter_2006_CyberCharter.pdf

Scruggs T. E. Mastropieri M. Berkeley S. Graetz J. E. (2010). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? Remedial and Special Education, 31, 437–448.

Watkins T. (2005). Exploring e-learning reforms in Michigan: The new educational (r)evolution. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/downloads/KeepingPace_2008.pdf

Williams J. P. (1991). Comprehension by learning disabled and nondisabled adolescents of personal/social problems in text. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 563–586.

Zwiers J. (2007). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.