BakerE. L. (2004). Principles for scaling up: Choosing, measuring effects, and promoting the widespread use of educational innovation. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA, Center for the Study of Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r634.pdf
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.CraddockC.HollenbeckK. N.HamlettC. L.SchatschneiderC. (2008). Effects of small-group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk students’ math problem solving: Are two tiers of prevention better than one?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 491–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.491
8.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.… HamlettC. L. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014701
9.
FuchsL. S.ZumetaR. O.SchumacherR. F.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.HamlettC. L.FuchsD. (2010). Enhancing second graders’ word-problem solving and emerging knowledge of algebra with schema-broadening instruction: A randomized control study. Elementary School Journal, 110, 440–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651191
10.
GaretM.PorterA.DesimoneL.BirmanB.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–945. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
11.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum Press.
JitendraA. K. (2007). Solving math word problems: Teaching students with learning disabilities using schema-based instruction. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14.
KennedyM. (1998). Form and substance of inservice teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
15.
Loucks-HorsleyS.StilesK. E.MundryS.LoveN.HewsonP. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16.
McInerneyM.HamiltonJ. (2007). Elementary and middle school technical assistance center: A demonstration of an approach to support the sustained use of scientifically based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 73, 242–255.
17.
McLaughlinM. W. (1990). The RAND change agent study revisited: Macro-perspective and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019009011
SteinM.SilbertJ.CarnineD. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
21.
VaughnS.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 432–444.