Introduction to the TEC Special Issue on Data-Based Individualization

Capizzi A. M. Fuchs L. S. (2005). Effects of curriculum-based measurement with and without diagnostic feedback on teacher planning. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 159–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260030401

Conduct Prevention Problems Research Group. (2002). Evaluation of the first 3 years of the Fast Track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 19–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:014274914287

Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute for Special Education.

Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. Compton D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.

Fuchs L. S. Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1984). The effects of curriculum-based measurement evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312021002449

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D Hamlett C. L. (1989). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193258901000209

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011a). The nation’s report card: Math 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011b). The nation’s report card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010, April). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs and the National Center on Response to Intervention. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/pdf/rtiessentialcomponents_042710.pdf

Wagner M. Marder C. Blackorby J. Cameto R. Newman L. Levine P. … Sumi C. (2003, November). The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_11/nlts2_report_2003_11_complete.pdf

Wagner M. Newman L. Cameto R. Garza N. Levine P. (2005, April). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf

Wanzek J. Vaughn S. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), 151–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00289.x