AgondiR.HarrisB. (2010). An experimental evaluation of four elementary school math curricula. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 199–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345741003770693.
2.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2010). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499715.
4.
BakerS. K.FienH.BakerD. L. (2010). Robust reading instruction in the early grades: Conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of tier 1 and tier 2 instructional supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(9), 1–20.
5.
BryantB.BryantD. P.KethleyC.KimS. A.PoolC.You-JinS. (2008). Preventing mathematics difficulties in the primary grades: The critical features of instruction in textbooks as part of the equation. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31, 21–35.
6.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame'enuiE. J.TarverS. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7.
ChardD.BakerS. K.ClarkeB.JungjohannK.DavisK. L. S.SmolkowskiK. (2008). Preventing early mathematics difficulties: The feasibility of a rigorous kindergarten mathematics curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 11–20.
8.
ChardD. J.JungjohannK. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for success in mathematics learning, intersection: Mathematics education sharing common grounds. Houston, TX: Exxon-Mobil Foundation.
9.
ClarkeB.DoablerC.BakerS.FienH.JungjohannK.CaryStrand M. (2011). Pursuing instructional coherence: Can strong tier 1 systems better meet the needs of the range of students in general education settings?. In GerstenR.Newman-GoncharR. (Eds.), Understanding RTI in mathematics: Proven methods and applications (pp. 49–64). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
10.
ClarkeB.SmolkowskiK.BakerS.FienH.DoablerC.ChardD. (2011). The impact of a comprehensive tier 1 core kindergarten program on the achievement of students at-risk in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 111, 561–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/659033.
CoyneM.Kame'enuiE. J.CarnineD. (Eds.). (2007). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
13.
CummingsK.AtkinsT.AllisonR.ColeC. (2008). Response to intervention: Investigating the new role of special educators. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(4), 24–31.
14.
DavisK.JungjohannK. (2009). Early learning in mathematics: Level K. Unpublished curriculum. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon College of Education, Center on Teaching and Learning.
15.
DoablerC.FienH.Nelson-WalkerN. J.BakerS. K. (in press). Evaluating three elementary mathematics programs for presence of research-based eight instructional design principles. Learning Disability Quarterly.
16.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431.
17.
HooverJ. J.LoveE. (2011). Supporting school-based response to intervention: A practitioner's model. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(3), 40–49.
18.
HudsonP.MillerS. P. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Boston, MA: Pearson.
19.
KilpatrickJ.SwaffordJ.FindellB. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematics Learning Study Committee.
20.
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (Practice Guide Report No. NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf.
21.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/focalpoints.aspx?id=282.
Newman-GoncharR.ClarkeB.GerstenR. (2009). A summary of nine key studies: Multi-tier intervention and response to interventions for students struggling in mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
24.
SaramaJ.ClementsD. H.StarkeyP.KleinA.WakelyA. (2008). Scaling up the implementation of a pre-kindergarten mathematics curriculum: Teaching for understanding with trajectories and technologies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 89–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345740801941332.
25.
SteinM.SilbertJ.CarnineD. (2006). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
26.
WuH. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. American Educator, 23(3), 14–19, 50–52.
27.
WuH. (2009). What's sophisticated about elementary mathematics? Plenty—That's why elementary schools need math teachers. American Educator, 33(3), 4–14.