AbbottM.WaltonC.TapiaY.GreenwoodC. R. (1999). Research to practice: A blueprint for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339–352.
2.
BullardJ. (2010). Creating environments for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
3.
ConroyM. A.DavisC. A.FoxJ. J.BrownW. H. (2002). Functional assessment of behavior and effective supports for young children with challenging behaviors. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27 (4), 35–47.
4.
DobrinskiD. (2004). The effects of specific praise used as a delayed directive on the on-task behavior of elementary students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (No. AAT3134998).
5.
DownerJ. T.Rimm-KaufmanS. E.PiantaR. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning?. School Psychology Review, 36, 413–432.
6.
EmmerE. T.StoughL. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology and teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36, 103–112.
7.
EvansG. W.LovellB. (1979). Design modification in an open-plan school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (1), 41–49.
8.
FullertonE.ConroyM.CorreaI. (2009). Early childhood teachers' use of specific praise statements with young children at-risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 118–35.
9.
GuardinoC. (2008). Modifying the classroom environment to reduce disruptive behavior and increase academic engagement in classrooms with students who have a hearing loss. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (No. AAT3304010).
10.
GuardinoC. (2009). Modifying the environment to improve student behaviors: A closer look at classrooms with students who have a hearing loss. Manuscript in preparation.
11.
GumpP. V. (1974). Operating environments in schools of open and traditional design. School Review, 82 (4), 575–593.
12.
Hood-SmithN. E.LeffingwellR. J. (1983). The impact of physical space alternation on disruptive classroom behavior: A case study. Education, 104, 224–231.
13.
LaneK. L.SmitherR.HusemanR.GuffeyJ.FoxJ. (2007). A function-based intervention to decrease disruptive behavior and increase academic engagement. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3–4, 348–364.
14.
LawryJ.DankoC. D.StrainP. S. (1999). Examining the role of the classroom environment in the prevention of problem behaviors. [Monograph]. Young Exceptional Children, 1, 49–61.
15.
MartellaR. C.NelsonJ. R.Marchand-MartellaN. E. (2003). Managing disruptive behaviors in the schools. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
ProshanskyE.WolfeM. (1974). The physical setting and open education. School Review, 82, 557–574.
17.
Public Agenda. (2004). Teaching interrupted: Do discipline policies in today's public schools foster the common good?New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://commongood.org/assets/attachments/22.pdf.
18.
SchillingD. L.SchwartzI. S. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 423–432.
19.
VisserJ. (2001). Aspects of physical provision for pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Support for Learning, 16 (2), 64–68.
20.
WeinsteinC. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 49, 577–610.
21.
WheldallK.OldsD. (1987). Of sex and seating: The effects of mixed and samesex seating arrangements in junior classrooms. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22 (1), 71–85.
22.
ZifferblattS. M. (1972). Architecture and human behavior: Toward increasing understanding of a functional relationship. Educational Technology, 12, 54–57.