The atmosphere: The air around you. (2000). Science explorer: Weather and climate. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BakerS.GerstenR.GrossenB. (2002). Interventions for students with reading comprehension problems. In ShinnM. A.WalkerH. M.StonerG. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (3nd ed.; pp. 731–754). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BartonM. L.HeidemaC.JordanD. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics and science. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 24–28.
5.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
BrownW. H.OdomS. L.ConroyM. A. (2001). An intervention hierarchy for promoting young children's peer interactions in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 162–175.
7.
ClarkA.CollinsS. (2007). Complexity science and student teacher supervision. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 160–172.
8.
CollinsA.HawkinsJ.CarverS. M. (1991). A cognitive apprenticeship for disadvantaged students. In MeansB.ChelmerC.KnappM. S. (Eds.), Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students (pp. 216–243). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
DuhonG. J. (2005). Monitoring implementation of reciprocal peer tutoring: Identifying and intervening with students who do not maintain accurate implementation. The School Psychology Review, 34(1), 74–86.
10.
FangZ. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520.
11.
FarrJ. N.JenkinsJ. J.PatersonD. G. (1951). Simplification of Flesch reading ease formula. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 333–337.
12.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ThompsonA.SvensonE.LouleeY.OtaibaS. A. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1) 15–21.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2001). Principles for prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85–95.
14.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KazdanS.AllenS. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading with and without training in elaborated help giving. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 201–219.
15.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KazdanS.MathesP.PrenticeK.SaenzL. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS) for high school students: Teacher manual. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Peabody College.
GreenwoodC. R.Arreaga-MayerC.UtleyC. A.GavinK. M.TerryB. J. (2001). Class wide peer tutoring learning management system: Applications with elementary-level English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 34–47.
18.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.BeeBe-FrankenbergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity and learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 198–205.
19.
HarveyS.GoudvisA. (1999). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Markham, Ontario: Pembroke Publishers Limited.
20.
HigginsK.BooneR.LovittT. C. (2002). Adapting challenging textbooks to improve content area learning. In ShinnM. A.WalkerH. M.StonerG. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
KingA. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–36.
23.
KingA.StaffieriA.AdelgaisA. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial: Interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 134–152.
24.
KleinP. D. (2006). The challenges of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 143–178.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
28.
PalincsarA. S.HerrenkohlL. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 26–32.
SeymouraJ. R.OsanaH. P. (2003) Reciprocal teaching procedures and principles: Two teachers' developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 325–344.
33.
TaylorW. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–433.
34.
TomlinsonC. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
35.
ToppingK. J.PeterC.StephenP.WhaleM. (2004). Cross-age peer tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 57–75.
36.
WalpoleS.JusticeL. M.InvernizziM. A. (2004). Closing the gap between research and practice: Case study of school-wide literacy reform. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 20, 261–283.
37.
WardR. E.WanderseeJ. H. (2001). Visualizing science using the roundhouse diagram. Science Scope, 24(4), 17–21.
38.
WardR. E.WanderseeJ. H. (2002). Struggling to understand abstract science topics: A roundhouse diagram-based study. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 575–591.
39.
WhiteB. Y.FrederiksenJ. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.