AbediJ.HejriF. (2004). Accommodations for students with limited English proficiency in the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Applied Measurement in Education, 17, 371–392.
2.
AlbusD.ThurlowM.LiuK.BielinskiJ. (2005). Reading test performance of English language learners using an English dictionary. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 245–253.
3.
BrinckerhoffL. C.BanerjeeM. (2007). Misconceptions regarding accommodations on high-stakes tests: Recommendations for preparing disability documentation for test takers with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 246–255.
4.
BrowderD. M.KarvonenM.DavisS.FallinK.Courtade-LittleG. (2005). The impact of teacher training on state alternate assessment scores. Exceptional Children, 71, 267–282.
5.
CohenA. S.GreggN.DengM. (2005). The role of extended time and item content on a high-stakes mathematics test. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 225–233.
6.
CoxM. L.HernerJ. G.DemczykM. J.NieberdingJ. J. (2006). Provision of testing accommodations for students with disabilities on statewide assessments: Statistical links with participation and discipline rates. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 346–354.
7.
EdgemonE. A.JablonskiB. R.LloydJ. W. (2006). Large-scale assessments: A teacher's guide to making decisions about accommodations. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38 (3), 6–11.
8.
ElbaumB. (2007). Effects of an oral testing accommodation on the mathematics performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 218–229.
9.
ElliottJ. L.ThurlowM. L. (2006). Improving test performance of students with disabilities … On district and state assessments (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
ElliottS. N.KratochwillT. R.SchulteT. R. (1998). The assessment accommodation checklist. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31 (2), 10–14.
11.
ElliottS. N.MarquartA. (2004). Extended time as a testing accommodation: Its effects and perceived consequences. Exceptional Children, 70, 349–367.
12.
FigueroaR. A.NewsomeP. (2006). The diagnosis of LD in English learners: Is it nondiscriminatory?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 206–214.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174–181.
14.
GarciaS. B.OrtizA. A. (2006). Preventing disproportionate representation: Culturally and linguistically responsive prereferral interventions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38 (4), 64–67.
15.
HerreraS. G.MurryK. G.CabralR. M. (2007). Assessment accommodations for classroom teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Ketterlin-GellerL. R.AlonzoJ.Braun-MoneganJ.TindalG. (2007). Recommendations for accommodations: Implications of (In)consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 194–206.
17.
Ketterlin-GellerL. R.YovanoffP.TindalG. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73, 331–347.
18.
LewinT. (2003, November 8). Change in SAT procedure echoes in disability realm: Looking closer at requests for more time. The New York Times, A10.
19.
MacArthurC. A.CavalierA. R. (2004). Dictation and speech recognition technology as test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 71, 43–58.
20.
McGuireJ. M.ScottS. S.ShawS. F. (2006). Universal design and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 166–175.
21.
SalendS. J. (2008). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
22.
SalendS. J. (in press). Inclusive testing, assessment, and grading practices: Informing instruction and supporting student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23.
SireciS.ScarpatiS.LiS. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75, 457–490.
24.
ThompsonS. J.QuenemoenR. F.ThurlowM. L. (2006). Factors to consider in the design of inclusive online assessments. In HrickoM.HowellS. L. (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges (pp. 102–117). Hershey, PA: Information Sciences Publishing.
25.
ThurlowM. L.LazarusS. S.ThompsonS. J.MorseA. B. (2005). State policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 232–241.
26.
YellM. L.KatsiyannasA.ShinerJ. G. (2006). The No Child Left Behind Act, adequately yearly progress, and students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38 (4), 32–39.
27.
YsseldykeJ.NelsonJ. R.ChristensonS.JohnsonD. R.DennisonA.TriezenbergH. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 75–94.