Colorado Student Assessment Program. (2006). Colorado Student Assessment Program, Summary Report, 2005–06. Colorado State Department of Education.
2.
DeshlerD.HockM.CattsH. (2006). Enhancing outcomes for struggling adolescent readers. IDA Perspectives. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/11768.
3.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (2006). High school students with disabilities: Strategies for accessing the curriculum. New York: Corwin Press.
4.
DonovanS.CrossC. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education.
5.
DuFourR.EakerR. E. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
6.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP. L.YoungC. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18 (3), 157–171.
GreeneJ. F. (1999). Language! The comprehensive literacy curriculum. (2nd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
9.
JohnsonE.MellardD. F.FuchsD.McKnightM. A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center.
10.
KovaleskiJ. (2003, December). The three tier model of identifying learning disabilities: Critical program features and system issues. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
11.
McMasterK. L.FuchsD.FuchsL.ComptonD. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463.
12.
MellardD. F.JohnsonE. S. (2008). RTI: A practitioner's guide to implementing response-to-intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13.
MorrisJ. D.EhrenB. J.LenzB. K. (1991). Building a model to predict which 4–8th graders will drop out of high school. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 286–293.
14.
Scantron. (2007). Performance series SM: Computer adaptive Internet assessment for schools. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.edperformance.com.
15.
SugaiG.HornerR.GreshamF. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In ShinnM.WalkerH.StonerG. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approach (pp. 315–350). Bethesda, MD: Bethesda School of Psychologists.
16.
SwansonH. L. (2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. Elementary School Journal, 101, 331–348.
17.
VaughnS. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes? Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO. Retrieved March 15, 2006, from http://www.nrcld.org/symposium2003/vaughn/index.html.