What Does the Law Say?

A. W. v. Jersey City Pub. Sch., 486 F.3d 791 (3d Cir. 2007).

Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Murphy, 126 S. Ct. 2455 (2006).

Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., 193 Fed. Appx. 26 (2d Cir. 2006), cert. granted, 127 S. Ct. 1393 (2007).

Durkee v. Livonia Cent. Sch. Dist., 487 F. Supp. 2d 313 (W.D.N.Y. 2007a).

Durkee v. Livonia Cent. Sch. Dist., 487 F. Supp. 2d 316 (W.D.N.Y. 2007b).

Fresh Start Acad. v. Toledo Bd. of Educ., 363 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. Ohio 2005).

G. D. v. Westmoreland Sch. Dist., 930 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1991).

IDEA regulations, 71 Fed. Reg. 46540 et seq. (2006), to be codified at 34 C.F.R. Part 300.

Leighty v. Laurel Sch. Dist., 457 F. Supp. 2d 546 (E.D. Pa. 2006).

Roland M. v. Concord Sch. Comm., 1989 WL 141688 (D. Mass. 1989), aff'd, 910 F.2d 983 (1st Cir. 1990).

T. S. v. Bd. of Educ., 10 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1993).

Westford Pub. Sch., EHLR 509:122 (Mass. SEA 1987).

Winkelman v. Parma City Sch. Dist., 127 S. Ct. 1994 (2007).

Zirkel P. A. (2005). A primer on special education law. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(1), 62–63.

Zirkel P. A. (2006a). The remedial authority of hearing and review officers under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Administrative Law Review, 58, 401–428.

Zirkel P. A. (2006b, May/June). What does the law say?. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(5), 67–68.

Zirkel P. A. (2007). Lay advocates and parent experts under the IDEA. West's Education Law Reporter, 217, 19–23.