Premises,Principles,and Processes for Integrating TECHnology into Instruction

Bailey R. L. Parette H. J. Jr. Stoner J. B. Angell M. E. Carol K. (2006). Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School, 37, 50–60.

Behrmann M. Jerome M. K. (2002). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: Update 2002. ERIC Digest E623. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 463 595).

Blackhurst A. E. (2005). Historical perspectives about technology applications for people with disabilities. In Edyburn D. Higgins K. Boone R. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 3–31). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.

Bowser G. Reed P. (1995). Education TECH points for assistive technology planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 325–338.

Bryant D. P. Bryant B. R. (1998). Using assistive technology adaptations to include students with learning disabilities in cooperative learning activities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 41–54.

Chambers A. C. (1997). Has technology been considered? A guide for IEP teams. Reston, VA: CASE/TAM.

Copley J. Ziviani J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11, 229–243.

Derer K. Polsgrove L. Rieth H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 62–80.

Dias L. B. (1999). Integration technology: Some things you should know. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(3), 10–13.

Gardner J. E. Wissick C. A. Schweder W. Canter L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary instruction in general and special education: Thematic units and technology. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 161–172.

Hasselbring T. S. Glaser C. H. W. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Future of Children, 10(2), 102–122.

Higgins E. L. Raskind M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Amendments of 1997, Public Law No. 105–17 § 602, U.S.C. 1401. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/Policy/IDEA/the_law.htm; pp. 8–9.

Lee Y. Vail C. O. (2005). Computer-based reading instruction for young children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 5–18.

MacArthur C. A. Cavalier A. R. (2004). Dictation and speech recognition technology as test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 71, 43–58.

Parette H. P. Wojcik B. W. Peterson-Karlan G. Hourcade J. J. (2005). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: What's cool and what's not. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 320–331.

Reading Pen [hardware]. (n.d.). Westford, MA: WizCom Technologies.

Reed P. Bowser G. (2005). Assistive technology and the IEP. In Edyburn D. Higgins K. Boone R. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 61–81). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.

Stodden R. A. Galloway L. M. Stodden N. J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 9–25.

Todis B. Walker H. M. (1993). User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1–16.

Word Wizard. (n.d.). [computer software]. Arundel Qld, Australia: Macroworks Pvt Ltd.

Zabala J. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from www.joyzabala.com.