BakerL.BrownA. L. (1984). Metacognitive skill in reading. In PearsonP. D.BarrR.KamilM.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
2.
BakerS.GertsenR.ScanlonD. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 65–77.
3.
BosC. S.VaughnS. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BrownA. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1; pp. 77–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BrownA. L.DayJ. D. (1983). Macro rules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
6.
DurkinD. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 482–533.
7.
EllisE. S.GravesA. W. (1990). Teaching rural students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10, 2–10.
8.
EnglertC. S.MariageT. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading “POSSE.”. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14, 123–138.
9.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). New York: Guilford.
10.
GravesA. W.LevinJ. R. (1989). Comparison of monitoring and mnemonic text-processing strategies in learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 232–236.
11.
HansenJ.PearsonP. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fifth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.
12.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22, 251–262.
13.
MasonL. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effect on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
14.
MasonL. H. (2005). TWA and PLANS (2005). Retrieved January 5, 2005 from University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, Special Education Department Web site: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/sped/twaplans/.
15.
MasonL. H.BentzJ. (June, 2004). Self-regulating and guiding reading comprehension for 87 students who struggle with expository text. Paper presented at Society for the Scientific Study of Reading 11th annual conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16.
MasonL. H.SnyderK. HickeyJonesD. P.KedemY. (in press). TWA + PLANS Strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine 4th-grade students. Exceptional Children.
17.
MoodyS. W.VaughnS.HughesM. T.FischerM. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305–316.
OgleD. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In MuthK. D. (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text (pp. 205–223). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20.
PressleyM. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Volume 3; pp. 545–461). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
SaenzL. M.FuchsL. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31–41.
22.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities?. Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 140–147.
23.
VaughnS.MoodyS. W.SchummJ. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in resource rooms. Exceptional Children, 64, 211–225.
24.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.