BambaraL. M.KogerF. (1996). Innovations: Opportunities for daily choice making. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
2.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
BrownF.BelzP.CorsiL.WenigB. (1993). Choice diversity for people with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 318–326.
4.
BrownF.GothelfC. R.GuessD.LehrD. (1998). Self-determination for individuals with the most severe disabilities: Moving beyond chimera. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 17–26.
5.
ButterfieldN.ArthurM. (1995). Shifting the focus: Emerging priorities in communication programming for students with a severe intellectual disability. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 41–50.
6.
DatilloJ.RuschF. R. (1985). Effects of choice on leisure participation for persons with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 194–199.
7.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.GastD. L.AultM. J.WileyK. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1–33.
8.
GastD. L.AultM. J.WoleryM.DoyleP. M.BelangerS. (1988). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching sight word reading to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 117–128.
9.
GoodeD. A.GaddyM. R. (1976). Ascertaining choice with alingual, deaf-blind and retarded clients. Mental Retardation, 14(6), 10–12.
10.
GreenC. W.ReidD. H.WhiteL. K.HalfordR. C.BrittainD. P.GardnerS. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31–43.
11.
GuessD.BensonH. A.Siegel-CauseyE. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 79–86.
12.
JolivetteK.WehbyJ. H.CanaleJ.MasseyN. G. (2001). Effects of choice-making on the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 131–145.
13.
KernL.MantegnaM. E.VorndranC. M.BailinD.HiltA. (2001). Choice of task sequence to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 3, 3–10.
14.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.EmersonE. (1996). A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 391–411.
15.
Lohrmann-O'RourkeS.BrowderD. M.BrownF. (2000). Guidelines for conducting socially valid systematic preference assessments. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 42–53.
16.
McDonnellJ. (1987). The effects of time delay and increasing prompt hierarchy strategies on the acquisition of purchasing skills by students with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 227–236.
17.
McDonnellJ.FergusonB. (1989). A comparison of time delay and decreasing prompt hierarchy strategies in teaching banking skills to students with moderate handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 85–91.
18.
PaceG. M.IvancicM. T.EdwardsG. L.IwataB. A.PageT. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255.
19.
ParsonsM. B.ReidD.ReynoldsJ.BumgarnerM. (1990). Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 253–258.
20.
ParsonsM. B.ReidD. H. (1990). Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: Providing opportunities to make choices. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 23, 183–195.
21.
RomaniukC.MiltenbergerR. G. (2001). The influence of preference and choice of activity on problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 152–159.
22.
ShevinM.KleinN. K. (1984). The importance of choice-making skills for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 159–166.
23.
SiegelE.WetherbyA. (2000). Nonsymbolic communication. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 409–452). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
24.
SigafoosJ.DempseyR. (1992). Assessing choice making among children with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 747–755.
25.
SnellM. E.GastD. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(3), 3–14.
26.
StaffordA. M.AlbertoP. A.FredrickL. D.HeflinL. J.HellerK. W. (2002). Preference variability and the instruction of choice making with students with severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, 37, 70–88.
27.
UmbreitJ.BlairK. (1996). The effects of preference, choice, and attention on problem behavior at school. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 151–161.
28.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.