BainA. M.BailetL. L., & MoatsL. C. (1991). Written language disorders: Theory into practice. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.*
2.
BeazleyM. R. (1989). Reading for a real reason: Computer pals across the world. Journal of Reading, 32, 598–605.
3.
BerrillD. P., & GallM. (1999). On the carpet: Emergent writer/readers' letter sharing in a penpal program. Language Arts, 76, 470–478.
4.
CrowhurstM. (1992). Some effects of corresponding with an older audience. Language Arts, 69, 268–273.
5.
GillamR. B., & JohnstonJ. R. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1325.
6.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (1999). Assessment and intervention in overcoming writing difficulties: An illustration from the self-regulated strategy development model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 255–264.
7.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R., & TroiaG. A. (2000). Self-regulated strategy development revisited: Teaching writing strategies to struggling writers. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 1–14.
8.
GravesD. (1985). All children can write. Learning Disabilities Focus, 1, 36–43.
9.
HamiltonA.C. (1992, November). Performance assessment of personal correspondence on the development of written language use and functions in traditional and process writing second-grade classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 253).
10.
HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (1996). Constructivism and students with special needs: Issues in the classroom. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 11, 133–137.
11.
KinkeadJ., & StoddartP. (1987). Pen-pals and I am the cheese. The ALAN Review, 15(1), 2–9.
12.
KratcoskiA. M. (1998). Guidelines for using portfolios in assessment and evaluation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29(1), 3–10.
13.
ManningM.ManningG., & MorrisonG. (1995). Letter-writing connections: A teacher, first-graders, and their parents. Young Children, 50(6), 34–38.
14.
RankinJ. L. (1992). Connecting literacy learners: A pen pal project. The Reading Teacher, 46, 204–214.
15.
ReifL. (1992). Seeking diversity: Language arts with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.*
16.
ScottC., & ErwinD. (1992). Descriptive assessment of writing: Process and products. In SecordW. (Ed.), Best practices in school speech-language pathology (Vol. II, pp. 60–73). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.*
17.
StrongC. J. (1998). The Strong Narrative Assessment Procedure. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.*
18.
StrongW. (in press). Exercising language, coaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19.
SturmJ., & KoppenhaverD. A. (2000). Supporting writing development in adolescents with developmental disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(2), 73–92.
20.
WestbyC. E., & ClauserP. S. (1999). The right stuff for writing: Assessing and facilitating written language. In CattsH. W. & KamhiA. G. (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 259–324). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.*
21.
WolfK. A. (1997). The effects of an international pen pal project on the written-language skills of students with language-learning disabilities. Unpublished master's thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
22.
YellinD. (1987, March). “My pen pal goes to college”: A functional approach to literacy learning. Paper presented at the Spring Conference of the National Council of Teachers of English, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282 236).
23.
YowellB. (1995). The world at our fingertips. Burleson: Burleson Independent School District, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 378 957).