Drawing on interview and observational data of college students and academic advisers at one research-intensive, public university, this article describes similarities and differences in how students from different social class backgrounds engage with academic advisers. Both middle-class and working-class students were comfortable seeking help to resolve immediate questions and concerns. Advisers’ efforts at establishing rapport and reaching out to students contributed to this parity. However, only middle-class students proactively cultivated their advisers’ familiarity to ensure their advisers would remember them and provide more personalized guidance in the future. Advisers viewed middle-class students who cultivated familiarity in a positive light. Cultivating familiarity also allowed middle-class students to have rich advising conversations despite having no pressing issues to address. This analysis introduces cultivating familiarity as a mechanism through which middle-class students may secure advantages, even in contexts where both middle- and working-class students feel comfortable seeking help.
ArmstrongElizabeth A.HamiltonLaura T.2013. Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BarnettSusanRoachScottSmithMartha. 2006. “Microskills: Advisor Behaviors That Improve Communication with Advisees.”NACADA Journal26(1):6–12. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-26.1.6.
3.
BassettBecca Spindel. 2021. “Big Enough to Bother Them? When Low-Income, First-Generation Students Seek Help from Support Programs.”Journal of College Student Development62(1):19–36. doi:10.1353/csd.2021.0002.
4.
BeattieIrenee R.2018. “Sociological Perspectives on First-Generation College Students.” Pp. 171–91 in Handbook of the Sociology of Education in the 21st Century, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, edited by SchneiderB.New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 78–92 in The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by GranovetterM.SwedbergR.New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2011. “‘I Need Help!’ Social Class and Children's Help-Seeking in Elementary School.”American Sociological Review76(6):862–82. doi:10.1177/0003122411427177.
8.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2014a. “Coached for the Classroom: Parents’ Cultural Transmission and Children's Reproduction of Educational Inequalities.”American Sociological Review79(5):1015–37. doi:10.1177/0003122414546931.
9.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2014b. “The Inconsistent Curriculum: Cultural Tool Kits and Student Interpretations of Ambiguous Expectations.”Social Psychology Quarterly77(2):185–209. doi:10.1177/0190272514521438.
10.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2018. Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle Class Secures Advantages in School. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChangJanetWangShu-wenManciniColinMcGrath-MahrerBriannade JesusSujey Orama. 2020. “The Complexity of Cultural Mismatch in Higher Education: Norms Affecting First-Generation College Students’ Coping and Help-Seeking Behaviors.”Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology26(3):280–94. doi:10.1037/cdp0000311.
12.
CherngHua-Yu S.WeiJunhowMorenoMartha. 2025. “Is Meeting Enough? Differences in Frequency and Consequences of Academic Advising Appointments between Marginalized and Mainstream College Students.”Educational Researcher. doi:10.3102/0013189X251356501.
13.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 2014. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CrookstonBurns B.2009. “A Developmental View of Academic Advising as Teaching.”NACADA Journal29(1):78–82. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-29.1.78.
15.
GableRachel. 2021. The Hidden Curriculum: First Generation Students at Legacy Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
GlennenRobert E.1975. “Intrusive College Counseling.”College Student Journal9(1):2–4.
17.
HemwallMartha K.TrachteKent C.2009. “Learning at the Core: Toward a New Understanding of Academic Advising.”NACADA Journal29(1):113–18. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-29.1.113.
18.
HimesHilleary.2023. “Academic Advising Outcomes across Advising Structures and Student Socioeconomic Status.” PhD dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
19.
HugheyJudy K.2011. “Strategies to Enhance Interpersonal Relations in Academic Advising.”NACADA Journal31(2):22–32. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-31.2.22.
20.
HurstAllison L.2019. Amplified Advantage: Going to a “Good” College in an Era of Inequality. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
21.
JackAnthony Abraham. 2014. “Culture Shock Revisited: The Social and Cultural Contingencies to Class Marginality.”Sociological Forum29(2):453–75. doi:10.1111/socf.12092.
22.
JackAnthony Abraham. 2016. “(No) Harm in Asking: Class, Acquired Cultural Capital, and Academic Engagement at an Elite University.”Sociology of Education89(1):1–19. doi:10.1177/0038040715614913.
23.
JackAnthony Abraham. 2019. The Privileged Poor: How Elite Colleges Are Failing Disadvantaged Students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
JohnsonAnthony M.2022. “Collaborating in Class: Social Class Context and Peer Help-Seeking and Help-Giving in an Elite Engineering School.”American Sociological Review87(6):981–1006. doi:10.1177/00031224221130506.
25.
JordanPeggy. 2000. “Advising College Students in the 21st Century.”NACADA Journal20(2):21–30. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-20.2.21.
26.
LareauAnnette. 2002. “Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black Families and White Families.”American Sociological Review67(5):747–76. doi:10.2307/3088916.
27.
LareauAnnette. 2011. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
LareauAnnette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.”American Sociological Review80(1):1–27. doi:10.1177/0003122414565814.
29.
LareauAnnetteWeiningerElliot B.2003. “Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment.”Theory and Society32(5/6):567–606.
30.
LeeElizabeth M.2016. Class and Campus Life: Managing and Experiencing Inequality at an Elite College. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
Longwell-GriceRobLongwell-GriceHope. 2008. “Testing Tinto: How Do Retention Theories Work for First-Generation, Working-Class Students?”Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice9(4):407–20. doi:10.2190/CS.9.4.a.
32.
Longwell-GriceRobAdsittNicole ZervasMullinsKathleenSerrataWilliam. 2016. “The First Ones: Three Studies on First-Generation College Students.”NACADA Journal36(2):34–46. doi:10.12930/NACADA-13-028.
33.
LowensteinMarc. 2009. “If Advising Is Teaching, What Do Advisors Teach?”NACADA Journal29(1):123–31. doi:10.12930/0271-9517-29.1.123.
OhrtElizabeth K.2016. “Proactive Advising with First-Generation Students: Suggestions for Practice.”The Mentor: Innovative Scholarship on Academic Advising18. doi:10.26209/mj1861250.
38.
RaoAliya Hamid. 2020. Crunch Time: How Married Couples Confront Unemployment. Oakland: University of California Press.
39.
RichardsBedelia Nicola. 2022. “Help-Seeking Behaviors as Cultural Capital: Cultural Guides and the Transition from High School to College among Low-Income First Generation Students.”Social Problems69(1):241–60. doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa023.
40.
RiveraLauren A.2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.”American Sociological Review77(6):999–1022. doi:10.1177/0003122412463213.
SchererMary L.2020. “Unequally Adrift: How Social Class and College Context Shape Students’ Mentorship Experiences.”Sociological Forum35(3):744–64. doi:10.1111/socf.12626.
43.
SoriaKristaBultmannMark. 2014. “Supporting Working-Class Students in Higher Education.”NACADA Journal34(2):51–62. doi:10.12930/NACADA-13-017.
44.
Stanton-SalazarRicardo. 1997. “A Social Capital Framework for Understanding the Socialization of Racial Minority Children and Youths.”Harvard Educational Review67(1):1–41.
45.
StrayhornTerrell L.2015. “Reframing Academic Advising for Student Success: From Advisor to Cultural Navigator.”NACADA Journal35(1):56–63. doi:10.12930/NACADA-14-199.
46.
StreibJessi. 2011. “Class Reproduction by Four Year Olds.”Qualitative Sociology34(2):337–52. doi:10.1007/s11133-011-9193-1.
47.
SweckerHadyn K.FifoltMatthewSearbyLinda. 2013. “Academic Advising and First-Generation College Students: A Quantitative Study on Student Retention.”NACADA Journal33(1):46–53. doi:10.12930/NACADA-13-192.
48.
TillyCharles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
Van JuraMattPrietoKaity. 2021. “Navigating College with MAAPS: Students’ Perceptions of a Proactive Advising Approach.”NACADA Journal41(2):27–39. doi:10.12930/NACADA-21-14.
50.
VarneyJennifer. 2013. “Proactive Advising.” Pp. 137–54 in Academic Advising Approaches: Strategies That Teach Students to Make the Most of College, edited by DrakeJ. K.JordanP.MillerM. A.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
YeeApril. 2014. “Major Decisions: How Social Class Shapes Undergraduate Achievement.” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
52.
YeeApril. 2016. “The Unwritten Rules of Engagement: Social Class Differences in Undergraduates’ Academic Strategies.”The Journal of Higher Education87(6):831–58. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.11780889.
