Expanded school-choice policies have weakened the traditional link between residence and school assignment. These policies have created new school options and new labor for families to manage and divide. Drawing on interviews with 90 mothers and 12 fathers of elementary-age children, I demonstrate that mothers across class, racial, and ethnic backgrounds absorb the labor of school decision-making. Working-class mothers emphasize self-sacrifice and search for schools that will keep their children safe. Middle-class mothers intensively research school information and seek niche school environments. Working-class and middle-class black and Latinx mothers engage in ongoing labor to monitor the racial climate within schools and to protect their children from experiences of marginalization. Partnered fathers and single primary-caregiver fathers invest less time and energy in the search for schools. These findings identify an important source of gender inequality stemming from modern educational policies and suggest new directions for research on school choice.
ArchbaldDouglas A.2004. “School Choice, Magnet Schools, and the Liberation Model: An Empirical Study.”Sociology of Education77(4):283–310. doi:10.1177/003804070407700402.
2.
BallStephen J.VincentCarol. 1998. “‘I Heard It on the Grapevine’: ‘Hot’ Knowledge and School Choice.”British Journal of Sociology of Education19(3):377–400.
3.
BastJoseph L.WalbergHerbert J.2004. “Can Parents Choose the Best Schools for Their Children?”Economics of Education Review23(4):431–40.
4.
BealHeather K.OlsonHendryPetra Munro2012. “The Ironies of School Choice: Empowering Parents and Reconceptualizing Public Education.”American Journal of Education118(4):521–50.
5.
BerendsMark.2015. “Sociology and School Choice: What We Know after Two Decades of Charter Schools.”Annual Review of Sociology41:159–80.
6.
BerendsMarkZottolaGenevieve2009. “Social Perspectives on School Choice.” Pp. 35–54 in Handbook of Research on School Choice, edited by BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.Walberg.H. J.New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.Milke.Melissa A.2006. The Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
Blair-LoyMary. 2009. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BobelChris. 2010. Paradox of Natural Mothering. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
10.
ChenKatherine K.MoskopMegan2020. “School Choice’s Idealized Premises and Unfulfilled Promises: How School Markets Simulate Options, Encourage Decoupling and Deception, and Deepen Disadvantages.”Sociology Compass14(3):e12766. doi:10.1111/soc4.12766.
11.
ChristiansenShawn L.Palkovitz.Rob2001. “Why the ‘Good Provider’ Role Still Matters: Providing as a Form of Paternal Involvement.”Journal of Family Issues22(1):84–106.
12.
ChristopherKaren. 2012. “Extensive Mothering: Employed Mothers’ Constructions of the Good Mother.”Gender & Society26(1):73–96.
13.
ChubbJohn E.MoeTerry M. 2011. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1998. “It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation.”Hypatia13(3):62–82.
15.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2005. “The Meaning of Motherhood in Black Culture and Black Mother–Daughter Relationships.” Pp. 285–95 in Gender through the Prism of Difference. 3rd ed., edited by ZinnM. B.Hondagneu-SoteloP.MessnerM. A. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2016. “Shifting the Center: Race, Class, and Feminist Theorizing about Motherhood.” Pp. 45–65 in Mothering, edited by GlennE.N.ChangG.ForceyL. R.New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
ColtraneScott. 2000. “Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.”Journal of Marriage and Family62(4):1208–33.
18.
ConnellRobert W.MesserschmidtJames W. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.”Gender & Society19(6):829–59.
19.
CooperCamille Wilson. 2007. “School Choice as ‘Motherwork’: Valuing African-American Women’s Educational Advocacy and Resistance.”International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education20(5):491–512.
20.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephen In Paik. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–338.
21.
CraigLyn. 2006. “Does Father Care Mean Fathers Share? A Comparison of How Mothers and Fathers in Intact Families Spend Time with Children.”Gender & Society20(2):259–81.
22.
CrittendenAnn. 2002. The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued. New York, NY: Macmillan.
23.
CucchiaraMaia. 2013. “‘Are We Doing Damage?’ Choosing an Urban Public School in an Era of Parental Anxiety.”Anthropology & Education Quarterly44(1):75–93. doi:10.1111/aeq.12004.
24.
CucchiaraMaiaHorvat.Erin McNamara2014. “Choosing Selves: The Salience of Parental Identity in the School Choice Process.”Journal of Education Policy29(4):486–509.
25.
DamingerAllison. 2019. “The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor.”American Sociological Review84(4):609–33. doi:10.1177/0003122419859007.
26.
DenicePatrickGrossBetheny2016. “Choice, Preferences, and Constraints: Evidence from Public School Applications in Denver.”Sociology of Education89(4):300–20. doi:10.1177/0038040716664395.
27.
DominaThurston. 2005. “Leveling the Home Advantage: Assessing the Effectiveness of Parental Involvement in Elementary School.”Sociology of Education78(3):233–49.
28.
DoucetAndrea. 2011. “‘It’s Just Not Good for a Man to Be Interested in Other People’s Children’: Fathers, Public Displays of Care and ‘Relevant Others.” Pp. 81–101 in Displaying Families, edited by DermottE.SeymourJ.New York, NY: Springer.
29.
DoughertyJackZannoniDianeChowhanMahamCoyne.Courteney2013. “School Information, Parental Decisions, and the Digital Divide.” Pp. 219–37 in Educational Delusions?: Why Choice Can Deepen Inequality and How to Make Schools Fair, edited by OrfieldG.FrankenbergE.Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
DowDawn Marie. 2016. “Integrated Motherhood: Beyond Hegemonic Ideologies of Motherhood.”Journal of Marriage and Family78(1):180–96.
31.
DowDawn Marie. 2019. Mothering While Black: Boundaries and Burdens of Middle-Class Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
EdinKathrynKefalas.Maria2011. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood before Marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
ElliottSinikkaAseltine.Elyshia2013. “Raising Teenagers in Hostile Environments: How Race, Class, and Gender Matter for Mothers’ Protective Carework.”Journal of Family Issues34(6):719–44.
34.
ElliottSinikkaPowellRachelBrenton.Joslyn2015. “Being a Good Mom: Low-Income, Black Single Mothers Negotiate Intensive Mothering.”Journal of Family Issues36(3):351–70. doi:10.1177/0192513X13490279.
35.
ElliottSinikkaReidMegan2019. “Low-Income Black Mothers Parenting Adolescents in the Mass Incarceration Era: The Long Reach of Criminalization.”American Sociological Review84(2):197–219.
36.
FongKelleyFaudeSarah2018. “Timing Is Everything: Late Registration and Stratified Access to School Choice.”Sociology of Education2018;91(3):242–62. doi:10.1177/0038040718785201.
37.
GareyAnita Ilta. 1999. Weaving Work and Motherhood. Vol. 105. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
38.
GersonKathleen. 2002. “Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender: Lessons from Two Generations of Work and Family Change.”Gender & Society16(1):8–28.
39.
GreensteinTheodore N. 2000. “Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension.”Journal of Marriage and Family62(2):322–35. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.
40.
HaysSharon. 1998. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press.
41.
HaysSharon. 2004. Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
HochschildArlieMachung.Anne1989. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York, NY: Penguin.
43.
HorvatErin McNamaraWeiningerElliot B.Lareau.Annette2003. “From Social Ties to Social Capital: Class Differences in the Relations between Schools and Parent Networks.”American Educational Research Journal40(2):319–51.
44.
LareauAnnette. 2000a. Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
45.
LareauAnnette. 2000b. “My Wife Can Tell Me Who I Know: Methodological and Conceptual Problems in Studying Fathers.”Qualitative Sociology23(4):407–33.
46.
LareauAnnette. 2011. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
LareauAnnetteEvansShani AdiaYee.April2016. “The Rules of the Game and the Uncertain Transmission of Advantage: Middle-Class Parents’ Search for an Urban Kindergarten.”Sociology of Education89(4):279–99.
48.
LauenLee Lauen. 2007. “Contextual Explanations of School Choice.”Sociology of Education80(3):179–209.
49.
LeeJung-SookBowenNatasha K. 2006. “Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap among Elementary School Children.”American Educational Research Journal43(2):193–218.
50.
LubienskiChristopher. 2003. “Innovation in Education Markets: Theory and Evidence on the Impact of Competition and Choice in Charter Schools.”American Educational Research Journal40(2):395–443.
51.
MaderNicoleHemphillClaraAbbasQasim2018. The Paradox of Choice: How School Choice Divides New York City Elementary Schools. New York, NY: Center for New York City Affairs.
52.
ManningWendy D. 2015. “Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing.”The Future of Children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation25(2):51–66.
53.
McCormackKaren. 2005. “Stratified Reproduction and Poor Women’s Resistance.”Gender & Society19(5):660–79.
54.
McNealRalph B.Jr.1999. “Parental Involvement as Social Capital: Differential Effectiveness on Science Achievement, Truancy, and Dropping Out.”Social Forces78(1):117–44.
55.
MerriamSharan B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. MichaelSaldana.Johnny2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
57.
MilkieMelissa A.RaleySara B.BianchiSuzanne M.2009. “Taking on the Second Shift: Time Allocations and Time Pressures of U.S. Parents with Preschoolers.”Social Forces88(2):487–517. doi:10.13 53/sof.0.0268.
58.
NeildRuth Curran. 2005. “Parent Management of School Choice in a Large Urban District.”Urban Education40(3):270–97.
59.
NelsonAlondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
60.
NelsonMargaret K. 2010. Parenting out of Control: Anxious Parents in Uncertain Times. New York, NY: NYU Press.
61.
ParcelToby L.HendrixJoshua A.Taylor.Andrew J. 2016. “‘How Far Is Too Far?’: Gender, Emotional Capital, and Children’s Public School Assignments.”Socius2. doi:10.1177/2378023116669955.
62.
PattilloMary. 2015. “Everyday Politics of School Choice in the Black Community.”Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race12(01):41–71.
63.
Posey-MaddoxLinn. 2014. When Middle-Class Parents Choose Urban Schools: Class, Race, and the Challenge of Equity in Public Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Posey-MaddoxLinnMckinney de RoystonMaxineHolmanAlea R.RallRaquel M.Johnson.Rachel A. 2021. “No Choice Is the ‘Right’ Choice: Black Parents’ Educational Decision-Making in Their Search for a ‘Good’ School.”Harvard Educational Review91(1):38–61.
65.
RandlesJennifer. 2021. “‘Willing to Do Anything for My Kids’: Inventive Mothering, Diapers, and the Inequalities of Carework.”American Sociological Review86(1):35–59. doi:10.1177/00031224209 77480.
66.
ReayDianeBallStephen J. 1998. “‘Making Their Minds Up’: Family Dynamics of School Choice.”British Educational Research Journal24(4):431–48. doi:10.1080/0141192980240405.
67.
RenzulliLinda A.RoscignoVincent J.2005. “Charter School Policy, Implementation, and Diffusion across the United States.”Sociology of Education78(4):344–66.
68.
SaporitoSalvatoreLareauAnnette1999. “School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice.”Social Problems46(3):418–39.
69.
SayerLiana C.BianchiSuzanne M.Robinson.John P.2004. “Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with Children.”American Journal of Sociology110(1):1–43.
70.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaulMarschall.Melissa2000. Choosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
SpainDaphneBianchiSuzanne1996. Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment among American Women. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
72.
StonePamela. 2008. Opting Out?: Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73.
Sui-ChuEsther HoWillmsJ. Douglas1996. “Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement.”Sociology of Education69(2):126–41.
74.
TownsendNicholas. 2010. Package Deal: Marriage, Work and Fatherhood in Men’s Lives. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
75.
VespaJonathan. 2009. “Gender Ideology Construction: A Life Course and Intersectional Approach.”Gender & Society23(3):363–87.
76.
WallGlendaArnoldStephanie2007. “How Involved Is Involved Fathering? An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood.”Gender & Society21(4):508–27.
77.
WalzerSusan. 2010. Thinking about the Baby: Gender and Transitions into Parenthood. Philadelphia, P: Temple University Press.
78.
WeiningerElliot B. 2014. “School Choice in an Urban Setting.” Pp. 268–94 in Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools, edited by LareauA.GoyetteK. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
WilliamsJoan. 2001. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
